2014—2018年内蒙古大兴安岭地区干雷电时空分布特征

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2021.01.007

气象与环境学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (1): 53-58.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2021.01.007

2014—2018年内蒙古大兴安岭地区干雷电时空分布特征

曲学斌¹(),王彦平¹,杨淑香¹,宋海清²,赵岳冀¹,邹晓华³

1. 呼伦贝尔市气象局, 内蒙古呼伦贝尔 021008
2. 内蒙古自治区生态与农业气象中心, 内蒙古呼和浩特 010051
3. 内蒙古大兴安岭林管局, 内蒙古呼伦贝尔 021008

收稿日期:2019-08-26 出版日期:2021-02-28 发布日期:2021-01-21
作者简介:曲学斌, 男, 1988年生, 工程师, 主要进行应用气象研究, E-mail: qxbtd@qq.com
基金资助:
干旱气象科学研究基金(IAM201706);内蒙古气象局科技创新项目(nmqxkjcx201806);内蒙古气象局科技创新项目(nmqxkjcx201702);内蒙古自治区科技计划项目(201602103);内蒙古自治区遥感创新团队

Spatio-temporal distribution characteristics of dry lightning in the Greater Khingan Mountains of Inner Mongolia from 2014 to 2018

Xue-bin QU¹(),Yan-ping WANG¹,Shu-xiang YANG¹,Hai-qing SONG²,Yue-ji ZHAO¹,Xiao-hua ZOU³

1. Hulunbuir Meteorological Service, Hulunbuir 021008, China
2. Ecology and Agro-Meteorology Center of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot 010051, China
3. Daxinganling Forestry Service of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hulunbuir 021008, China

Received:2019-08-26 Online:2021-02-28 Published:2021-01-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用2014—2018年内蒙古大兴安岭地区闪电定位仪监测的雷电及CLDAS逐日降水数据，确定干雷电期间降水阈值并筛选干雷电监测数据，分析干雷电在大兴安岭地区的时空分布特征，为大兴安岭地区雷击火的防范提供科学依据。结果表明：大兴安岭地区CLDAS降水与气象站点降水的误差较小，有较高的适用性，可以满足干雷电的分析需求。大兴安岭地区的年平均雷电次数为36013.4次，以负地闪为主，年平均雷电日数为110.4 d，其中有42.3%的雷电发生时的日降水量小于5 mm，宜作为该地区干雷电发生时的降水阈值。以此阈值筛选，大兴安岭地区年平均干雷电发生15229.8次，每年7月年平均干雷电出现次数最多，干雷电的雷电流绝对强度在5月和9月较强。该地区林业局中，永安山东部、满归南部、阿龙山东部、汗马自然保护区北部、甘河东部、阿里河西部、吉文北部、大杨树东南部、巴林南部、南木、绰尔东部等地的年平均干雷电次数达到0.4次/km²，且雷电流绝对强度也普遍偏强，是大兴安岭干雷电的高发区域，应加强上述地区干雷电的日常监测和雷击火防范工作。

关键词: 干雷电, CLDAS, 大兴安岭, 气候响应

Abstract:

Based on the data of lightning and the CLDAS (CMA Land Data Assimilation System) daily precipitation monitored at the lightning locators in the Greater Khingan Mountains of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region from 2014 to 2018, the precipitation threshold during the dry lightning period was determined and the data of dry lightning monitoring was screened to analyze the spatio-temporal distribution characteristics of dry lightning in the Greater Khingan Mountains, to provide a scientific basis for the prevention of lightning fire in the Greater Khingan Mountains.The results show that the precipitation error between the CLDAS and meteorological stations in the Greater Khingan Mountains is small and has high applicability, which can meet the demand for dry lightning analysis.The annual average lightning frequency in the Greater Khingan Mountains is 36013.4 times, mainly with the negative ground flash.The annual average lightning days are 110.4 d, of which 42.3% of the amount of daily precipitation is less than 5 mm when the lightning occurs, which should be used as the precipitation threshold when dry lightning occurs in this region.According to the screening of this threshold, the annual average dry lightning occurring in the Greater Khingan Mountains is 1, 5229.8 times.The annual average dry lightning occurs mostly in July.The absolute intensity of the dry lightning current in May and September is stronger.Among the Forestry Services in the region, the intensity of the lightning current is generally strong at these regions including the eastern part of Yong'an Mountain, the south of Mangui, the eastern part of Along Mountain, the northern part of the Khanma Nature Reserve, the eastern part of the Ganhe River, the western part of the Ali River, the northern part of the Jiwen, the southeast of the Poplar, the southern part of Bahrain, the South Wood, and the eastern part of Chao'er, with the annual average dry lightning reaching 0.4 times/km².These regions belong to the high-risk areas for dry lightning.The daily monitoring of dry lightning and the lightning fire prevention work in the above areas should be strengthened.

Key words: Dry lightning, CMA land data assimilation system (CLDAS), Greater Khingan Mountains, Climate response

中图分类号:

P427.3

曲学斌,王彦平,杨淑香,宋海清,赵岳冀,邹晓华. 2014—2018年内蒙古大兴安岭地区干雷电时空分布特征[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2021, 37(1): 53-58.

Xue-bin QU,Yan-ping WANG,Shu-xiang YANG,Hai-qing SONG,Yue-ji ZHAO,Xiao-hua ZOU. Spatio-temporal distribution characteristics of dry lightning in the Greater Khingan Mountains of Inner Mongolia from 2014 to 2018[J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2021, 37(1): 53-58.

图/表 6

图1

图2

表1

图3

图4

图5

参考文献 18

1	张吉利, 毕武, 王晓红, 等. 雷击火发生的影响因子与预测研究进展[J]. 应用生态学报, 2013, 24 (9): 2674- 2684.
2	Wotton B M , Martell D L . A lightning fire occurrence model for Ontario[J]. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2005, 35 (6): 1389- 1401. doi: 10.1139/x05-071
3	Andrews P L. Fire danger rating and fire behavior prediction in the United States[C]. Proceedings of Fifth NRIFD Symposium International Symposium on Forest Fire Protection, Japan, 2005: 106-117.
4	雷小丽, 周广胜, 贾丙瑞, 等. 大兴安岭地区森林雷击火与闪电的关系[J]. 应用生态学报, 2012, 23 (7): 1743- 1750.
5	黄艳, 张吉利, 张明远, 等. 干雷暴与森林火险关系研究进展[J]. 世界林业研究, 2015, 28 (6): 40- 45.
6	李顺, 吴志伟, 梁宇, 等. 大兴安岭林火发生的时空聚集性特征[J]. 生态学杂志, 2017, 36 (1): 198- 204.
7	于文颖, 周广胜, 赵先丽, 等. 大兴安岭林区火灾特征及影响因子[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2009, 25 (4): 1- 5.
8	孙虹雨, 程攀, 程佳悦, 等. 辽宁省林火发生和过火面积与气象因子关系分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2018, 34 (5): 128- 134.
9	王晓红, 黄艳, 张吉利, 等. 基于闪电定位数据和气象数据的大兴安岭雷击火预测模型研究[J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2017, 37 (3): 44- 48.
10	田晓瑞, 舒立福, 赵凤君, 等. 大兴安岭雷击火发生条件分析[J]. 林业科学, 2012, 48 (7): 98- 103.
11	师春香, 张帅, 孙帅, 等. 改进的CLDAS降水驱动对中国区域积雪模拟的影响评估[J]. 气象, 2018, 44 (8): 985- 997.
12	曲学斌, 张煦明, 孙卓. 大兴安岭植被NDVI变化及其对气候的响应[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2019, 35 (2): 77- 83.
13	孙小龙, 宋海清, 李平, 等. 基于CLDAS资料的内蒙古干旱监测分析[J]. 气象, 2015, 41 (10): 1245- 1252.
14	宋海清, 李云鹏, 师春香, 等. 内蒙古地区下垫面变化对土壤湿度数值模拟的影响[J]. 大气科学, 2016, 40 (6): 1165- 1181.
15	朱浩, 孙浩, 王凯, 等. 安徽省云地闪密度与雷暴日数关系的研究[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2018, 34 (1): 61- 68.
16	Dowdy A J, Mills G A. Dry lightning in Australia[C]. The International Bushfire Research Conference, Australia, 2008.
17	Rorig M L , Ferguson S A . The 2000 fire season: lightning-caused fires[J]. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 2002, 47 (7): 786- 791.
18	赵可新, 宋庆武, 乌秋力, 等. 原始林区雷击火发生的气象条件及预警技术[J]. 内蒙古气象, 2006, (2): 22- 24.

日降水量级/mm	站点平均降水量/mm	CLDAS平均误差/mm	平均误差与平均降水量的比值/(%)	CLDAS平均绝对误差/mm	平均绝对误差与平均降水量的比值/(%)	CLDAS最大误差/mm
≥50	62.5	-10.9	-17.4%	10.9	17.4%	29.3
25—50	32.3	-9.4	-29.1%	10.4	32.2%	23.2
10—25	15.3	-2.0	-13.1%	4.6	30.1%	18.5
5—10	7.0	-0.6	-8.6%	2.6	37.1%	14.0
0.1—5	1.6	0.4	25.0%	1.1	68.8%	17.1
无降水	0.0	0.2	-	0.2	-	20.9

[1]	曲学斌, 张煦明, 孙卓. 大兴安岭植被NDVI变化及其对气候的响应[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2019, 35(2): 77-83.
[2]	史珺, 李明财, 曹经福, 郭军, 熊明明. 天津市典型办公建筑极端能耗气候响应特征分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2016, 32(2): 72-78.
[3]	姬兴杰,李凤秀,王纪军. 1971—2010年河南省霜期的时空分布及其对气温的响应[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2015, 31(1): 67-75.
[4]	于文颖,周广胜,赵先丽,谢艳兵,贾庆宇. 大兴安岭林区火灾特征及影响因子分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2009, 25(4): 1-5.

2014—2018年内蒙古大兴安岭地区干雷电时空分布特征

Spatio-temporal distribution characteristics of dry lightning in the Greater Khingan Mountains of Inner Mongolia from 2014 to 2018

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 18

相关文章 4

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10