基于离子配对法的黄山地区云凝结核闭合研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2021.01.011

Abstract

Abstract:

To conduct a closed study on cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) at Guangmingding, Huangshan Mountain, physical and chemical properties and CCN number concentration of atmospheric aerosols were observed from June 30 to July 28, 2014.The temporal characteristics of chemical composition, spectral distribution, and CCN number concentration were analyzed.The CCN number concentration calculated by ion-pairing method based on κ-Köhler theory was compared with the observations.The results indicated that the calculated and measured CCN concentrations show close correlation and high accuracy.The results of low supersaturation CCN closure are better than those of the high supersaturation, the CCN number concentration is underestimated when the supersaturation is low and overestimated when that is high, which shows that the chemical composition data of aerosol is very important for the prediction of the CCN number concentration, and the use of this method can lead to the closure of CCN.Considering the influence of 40% Water Soluble Organic Carbon (WSOC) on the hygroscopicity of aerosol particles, CCN closure results are better at the lower supersaturation, but the effect is not significant, especially when the fitting results are relatively low, there is no effect under poor high supersaturation.Therefore, the water-soluble inorganic components in aerosol particles have an important effect on the activation of CCN, while the WSOC, which contains more content, complex chemical components, and uncertain hygroscopicity, has a limited effect on the activation of CCN, which is consistent with some studies that the influence of aerosol hygroscopicity is more important than that of organic components with complex characteristics.

Key words: Cloud condensation nuclei (CCN), Closed study, Chemical composition, Water soluble organic carbon (WSOC), Huangshan Mountain

CLC Number:

X513

Xin QIN,Jin-guang ZHANG,Ze-feng ZHANG,Qing MIAO,Hong-qiang LI,Shu-hui ZHAO,Si-hang QUAN,Jia-li MA. Study on the closure of cloud condensation nuclei based on ion pairing method at Huangshan Mountain[J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2021, 37(1): 82-90.

Figures/Tables 6

Table 1

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.5

References 36

1	高星星, 桂海林, 陈艳, 等. 中国典型地区夏季气溶胶时空分布及其对云和降水的影响[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2020, 36 (1): 11- 20.
2	秦彦硕, 银燕, 杨素英, 等. 黄山地区春夏季气溶胶离子组分及其对云微物理特征的影响[J]. 气象学报, 2012, 70 (6): 1334- 1346.
3	Khvorostyanov V I , Curry J A . Aerosol size spectra and CCN activity spectra: Reconciling the lognormal, algebraic, and power laws[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2006, 111 (D12): D12202. doi: 10.1029/2005JD006532
4	段婧, 楼小凤, 陈勇, 等. 基于航测的珠三角气溶胶垂直分布及活化特性[J]. 应用气象学报, 2019, 30 (6): 677- 689.
5	卢广献, 郭学良. 环北京春季大气气溶胶分布、来源及其与CCN转化关系的飞机探测[J]. 科学通报, 2012, 57 (15): 1334- 1344.
6	Petters M D , Prenni A J , Kreidenweis S M , et al. On measuring the critical diameter of cloud condensation nuclei using mobility selected aerosol[J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2007, 41 (10): 907- 913. doi: 10.1080/02786820701557214
7	赵洁心, 马嫣, 郑军. 南京北郊云凝结核活化特征观测及闭合研究[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018, 38 (7): 2415- 2424.
8	顾雪松, 银燕, 谭浩波, 等. 珠江三角洲地区气溶胶分档活化特性与闭合实验[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018, 33 (9): 1553- 1562.
9	Medina J , Nenes A , Sotiropoulou R E P , et al. Cloud condensation nuclei closure during the International Consortium for Atmospheric Research on Transport and Transformation 2004 campaign: Effects of size-resolved composition[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2007, 112 (D10): D10S31.
10	赵春生, 彭大勇, 段英. 海盐气溶胶和硫酸盐气溶胶在云微物理过程中的作用[J]. 应用气象学报, 2005, 16 (4): 417- 425.
11	周胜杰, 张洪海, 杨桂朋. 东海PM_2.5和PM₁₀中水溶性离子的组成与化学特性[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018, 38 (3): 900- 909.
12	张程, 于兴娜, 安俊琳, 等. 南京北郊霾天气溶胶化学组分粒径分布特征[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018, 38 (8): 2873- 2881.
13	Katz U , Kocmond W C . An investigation of the size-supersaturation relationship of soluble condensation nuclei[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1973, 30 (1): 160- 165. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1973)030<0160:AIOTSS>2.0.CO;2
14	Gerber H E , Hoppel W A , Wojciechowski T A . Experimental verification of the theoretical relationship between size and critical supersaturation of salt nuclei[J]. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences, 1977, 34 (11): 1836- 1841. doi: 10.1175/1520-0469(1977)034<1836:EVOTTR>2.0.CO;2
15	Giebl H , Berner A , Reischl G , et al. CCN activation of oxalic and malonic acid test aerosols with the University of Vienna cloud condensation nuclei counter[J]. Journal of Aerosol Science, 2002, 33 (12): 1623- 1634. doi: 10.1016/S0021-8502(02)00115-5
16	Broekhuizen K E , Thornberry T , Kumar P P , et al. Formation of cloud condensation nuclei by oxidative processing: Unsaturated fatty acids[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2004, 109 (D24): D24206. doi: 10.1029/2004JD005298
17	张良玉, 魏丽欣, 赵春雷, 等. 2012-2017年京津冀区域酸雨变化特征[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2019, 35 (4): 47- 54.
18	Facchini M C , Mircea M , Fuzzi S , et al. Cloud albedo enhancement by surface-active organic solutes in growing droplets[J]. Nature, 1999, 401 (6750): 257- 259. doi: 10.1038/45758
19	朱彤, 尚静, 赵德峰. 大气复合污染及灰霾形成中非均相化学过程的作用[J]. 中国科学: 化学, 2011, 40 (12): 1731- 1740.
20	Bigg E K . Discrepancy between observation and prediction of concentrations of cloud condensation nuclei[J]. Atmospheric Research, 1986, 20 (1): 81- 86. doi: 10.1016/0169-8095(86)90010-4
21	Cantrell W , Shaw G , Cass G R , et al. Closure between aerosol particles and cloud condensation nuclei at Kaashidhoo Climate Observatory[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2001, 106 (D22): 28711- 28718. doi: 10.1029/2000JD900781
22	Roberts G C , Nenes A . A continuous-flow streamwise thermal-gradient CCN chamber for atmospheric measurements[J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2005, 39 (3): 206- 221. doi: 10.1080/027868290913988
23	Petters M D , Kreidenweis S M . A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2007, 7 (8): 1961- 1971. doi: 10.5194/acp-7-1961-2007
24	Almeida G P , Brito J , Morales C A , et al. Measured and modelled cloud condensation nuclei(CCN)concentration in São Paulo, Brazil: the importance of aerosol size-resolved chemical composition on CCN concentration prediction[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2014, 14 (14): 7559- 7572. doi: 10.5194/acp-14-7559-2014
25	Zhang F , Li Y , Li Z , et al. Aerosol hygroscopicity and cloud condensation nuclei activity during the AC³ Exp campaign: implications for cloud condensation nuclei parameterization[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2014, 14 (24): 13423- 13437. doi: 10.5194/acp-14-13423-2014
26	缪青. 黄山CCN观测及其闭合分析[D]. 南京: 南京信息工程大学, 2015.
27	Liu B Y H , Pui D Y H , Lin B Y . Aerosol charge neutralization by a radioactive alpha source[J]. Particle & Particle Systems Characterization, 1986, 3 (3): 111- 116.
28	王红磊. 南京市大气气溶胶理化特征观测研究[D]. 南京: 南京信息工程大学, 2013.
29	Petters M D , Kreidenweis S M . A single parameter representation of hygroscopic growth and cloud condensation nucleus activity-Part 2:Including solubility[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2008, 8 (20): 6273- 6279. doi: 10.5194/acp-8-6273-2008
30	Sha T , Ma X Y , Jia H , et al. Aerosol chemical component: Simulations with WRF-Chem and comparison with observations in Nanjing[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2019, 218, 116982. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2019.116982
31	Stokes R H , Robinson R A . Interactions in aqueous nonelectrolyte solutions[J]. The Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1966, 70 (7): 2126- 2131. doi: 10.1021/j100879a010
32	Gysel M , Crosier J , Topping D O , et al. Closure study between chemical composition and hygroscopic growth of aerosol particles during TORCH2[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2007, 7 (24): 6131- 6144. doi: 10.5194/acp-7-6131-2007
33	刘鹏飞. 高相对湿度下华北地区气溶胶吸湿性研究[D]. 北京: 北京大学, 2011.
34	安林昌, 张恒德, 李凯飞. 降雨天气对大气污染物浓度的影响分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2018, 34 (3): 58- 70.
35	Facchini M C , Decesari S , Mircea M , et al. Surface tension of atmospheric wet aerosol and cloud/fog droplets in relation to their organic carbon content and chemical composition[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2000, 34 (28): 4853- 4857. doi: 10.1016/S1352-2310(00)00237-5
36	Turpin B J , Lim H J . Species contributions to PM_2.5 mass concentrations: Revisiting common assumptions for estimating organic mass[J]. Aerosol Science and Technology, 2001, 35 (1): 602- 610. doi: 10.1080/02786820119445

物质名称	分子量	密度/(g·cm^-3)	κ
NH₄NO₃	80.04	1.72	0.68
NH₄HSO₄	115.11	1.78	0.56
H₂SO₄	98.08	1.83	1.13
(NH₄)₂SO₄	132.14	1.77	0.53
WSOC	-	1.40	0.1

Study on the closure of cloud condensation nuclei based on ion pairing method at Huangshan Mountain

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 6

References 36

Related Articles 1

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10