特高压跨区域输电对空气质量的影响研究

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2022.04.016

Abstract

Abstract:

According to the ultra-high voltage (UHV) transmission project of "Xilin Gol-Jinan", the change of pollutant concentration in Beijing, Hebei, and Tianjin was simulated and evaluated by the atmospheric chemical model WRF-Chem V3.7.The influence of UHV cross-regional transmission on air quality in the affected area was evaluated by setting different locations, heights, and emissions.Results show that the project has the largest impact on the atmospheric environment of Beijing in the case of southeast wind.According to the height of the virtual plant, the concentrations of PM_2.5 at the height of 9 m, 27 m, 46 m, 64 m, 91 m, 130 m, 185 m, and 255 m were calculated.It is found that the greatest influence on the concentrations of PM_2.5 is induced at the height of 91 m near the power plant.After long-distance transportation, the power plant has the greatest influence on the concentrations of PM_2.5 below 45 m.The project of the power plant in "Xilin Go-Jinan" has little impact on the variation of pollutants concentration in Beijing.

Key words: Atmospheric chemical model, Virtual power plant, Air quality

CLC Number:

X51/TM621

Xiao-hui MA,Jing XU,Zi-yin ZHANG,Zi-ming LI,Wei WEN. Influence of the ultra-high voltage cross-regional transmission on air quality[J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2022, 38(4): 136-144.

Figures/Tables 9

Fig.1

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Fig.6

Fig.7

Table 1

Table 2

References 41

1	谢海燕, 贾彦鹏. 我国雾霾治理机制分析及有关对策[J]. 中国经贸导刊, 2020, (22): 77- 79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-9777.2020.22.026
2	秦雨, 张强, 李鑫, 等. 中国燃煤电厂大气污染物排放的健康影响特征[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39 (12): 5289- 5295. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201804157
3	肖春艳, 邰超, 赵同谦, 等. 燃煤电厂附近农田土壤中多环芳烃的分布特征[J]. 环境科学学报, 2008, 28 (8): 1579- 1585. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-2468.2008.08.013
4	严茹莎, 侯勇, 陆建宇, 等. 长三角区域燃煤排放污染物现状及其环境影响[J]. 环境影响评价, 2016, 38 (6): 66- 72.
5	苗运玲, 张军, 郑玉萍, 等. 乌鲁木齐市酸雨变化特征及其与气象因子的关系[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2020, 36 (5): 62- 68. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2020.05.008
6	朱红蕊, 刘赫男, 张洪玲, 等. 2008—2018年黑龙江省大气自净能力变化特征分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2020, 36 (4): 89- 94. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2020.04.012
7	高星星, 桂海林, 陈艳, 等. 中国典型地区夏季气溶胶时空分布及其对云和降水的影响[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2020, 36 (1): 11- 20.
8	薛亦峰, 闫静, 魏小强. 燃煤控制对北京市空气质量的改善分析[J]. 环境科学研究, 2014, 27 (3): 253- 258.
9	柴发合, 薛志钢, 支国瑞, 等. 农村居民散煤燃烧污染综合治理对策[J]. 环境保护, 2016, 44 (6): 14- 19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-1021.2016.06.004
10	王慧丽, 雷宇, 陈潇君, 等. 京津冀燃煤工业和生活锅炉的技术分布与大气污染物排放特征[J]. 环境科学研究, 2015, 28 (10): 1510- 1517.
11	张建宇, 潘荔, 杨帆, 等. 中国燃煤电厂大气污染物控制现状分析[J]. 环境工程技术学报, 2011, 1 (3): 185- 196.
12	郝吉明, 王金南, 王志轩, 等. 中长期煤利用中大气污染控制技术路线[J]. 中国工程科学, 2015, 17 (9): 42- 48.
13	刘含笑, 陈招妹, 王少权, 等. 燃煤电厂SO₃排放特征及其脱除技术[J]. 环境工程学报, 2019, 13 (5): 1128- 1138.
14	帅伟, 李立, 崔志敏, 等. 基于实测的超低排放燃煤电厂主要大气污染物排放特征与减排效益分析[J]. 中国电力, 2015, 48 (11): 131- 137.
15	张显, 田莎莎, 刘盈盈, 等. 沈阳市采暖期与非采暖期空气PM_2.5污染特征及来源分析[J]. 环境科学, 2019, 40 (3): 1062- 1070.
16	董德明, 杜山山, 黄亚司, 等. 长春市冬春季环境空气中PM_2.5污染特征与来源解析[J]. 吉林大学学报: 理学版, 2020, 58 (5): 1278- 1286.
17	李枭鸣, 朱法华, 王圣, 等. 我国火电行业碳减排技术的综合评估研究[J]. 环境科技, 2014, 27 (4): 14- 17.
18	席颖. 燃煤锅炉烟气对环境污染治理技术及应用[J]. 工程建设与设计, 2018, (23): 167- 169.
19	陈清如. 我国燃煤大气污染的防治[J]. 江苏科技学院学报: 工程技术版, 2003, 16 (1): 1- 7.
20	王彦超, 蒋春来, 贺晋瑜, 等. 京津冀大气污染传输通道城市燃煤大气污染减排潜力[J]. 中国环境科学, 2018, 38 (7): 2401- 2405.
21	徐静馨, 朱法华, 王圣, 等. 超低排放燃煤电厂和燃气电厂综合对比[J]. 中国电力, 2020, 53 (2): 164- 172. 164-172, 179
22	陶雷行, 翁杰, 李晓峰, 等. 燃煤烟气超低排放全流程协同削减三氧化硫效果分析[J]. 中国电力, 2018, 51 (3): 177- 184.
23	宋畅, 张翼, 郝剑, 等. 燃煤电厂超低排放改造前后汞污染排放特征[J]. 环境科学研究, 2017, 30 (5): 672- 677.
24	张军, 郑成航, 张涌新, 等. 某1000MW燃煤机组超低排放电厂烟气污染物排放测试及其特性分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2016, 36 (5): 1310- 1314.
25	徐海红, 莫华, 吴家玉, 等. 京津冀地区燃煤电站不同污染控制情景下的环境效益分析[J]. 环境工程, 2017, 35 (10): 166- 170.
26	付兴, 原芊芳. 燃煤锅炉烟气对环境污染治理技术及应用的问题研究[J]. 环境与发展, 2018, 30 (5): 48.
27	司小飞, 李元昊, 黄艳, 等. 燃煤发电厂贮灰场环境污染与防治[J]. 环境工程, 2017, 35 (11): 110- 113. 110-113, 119
28	Dennis R L , Byun D W , Novak J H , et al. The next generation of integrated air quality modeling: EPA's models-3[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 1996, 30 (12): 1925- 1938.
29	Wang T J , Jiang F , Deng J J , et al. Urban air quality and regional haze weather forecast for Yangtze River Delta region[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2012, 58, 70- 83.
30	Tie X , Madronich S , Li G , et al. Simulation of Mexico City plumes during the MIRAGE-Mex field campaign using the WRF-Chem model[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2009, 9 (14): 4621- 4638.
31	Lei W , de Foy B , Zavala M , et al. Characterizing ozone production in the Mexico City Metropolitan Area: a case study using a chemical transport model[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2007, 7 (5): 1347- 1366.
32	Jiang F , Wang T J , Wang T T , et al. Numerical modeling of a continuous photochemical pollution episode in Hong Kong using WRF-chem[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2008, 42 (38): 8717- 8727.
33	Geng F , Tie X , Guenther A , et al. Effect of isoprene emissions from major forests on ozone formation in the city of Shanghai, China[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2011, 11 (20): 10449- 10459.
34	王扬锋, 马雁军, 权维俊, 等. 东北区域空气质量数值预报模式应用研究进展[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2020, 36 (6): 130- 136.
35	赵秀娟, 徐敬, 张自银, 等. 北京区域环境气象数值预报系统及PM_2.5预报检验[J]. 应用气象学报, 2016, 27 (2): 160- 172.
36	邓涛, 吴兑, 邓雪娇, 等. 珠三角空气质量暨光化学烟雾数值预报系统[J]. 环境科学与技术, 2013, 36 (4): 62- 68.
37	徐敬, 张小玲, 蔡旭晖, 等. 基于敏感源分析的动态大气污染排放方案模拟[J]. 应用气象学报, 2016, 27 (6): 654- 665.
38	徐敬, 陈丹, 赵秀娟, 等. RMAPS_Chem V1.0系统SO₂排放清单优化效果评估[J]. 应用气象学报, 2019, 30 (2): 164- 176.
39	杨洪斌, 张云海, 李克非, 等. 估算模式AERSCREEN的参数敏感性研究[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2019, 35 (6): 126- 131.
40	邹青青, 蔡旭晖, 郭梦婷, 等. 北京地区大气污染物源区特征及与重污染过程的关系[J]. 北京大学学报: 自然科学版, 2018, 54 (2): 341- 349.
41	蔡旭晖, 丑景垚, 宋宇, 等. 北京市大气静稳型重污染的印痕分析[J]. 北京大学学报: 自然科学版, 2008, 44 (1): 135- 141.

12月	污染物日均减少值/(μg·m^-3)				污染物日均减少比例/(%)
12月	SO₂	NO₂	CO	PM₁₀	SO₂	NO₂	CO	PM₁₀
2日	0.05	0.02	0.51	0.04	0.11	0.03	0.07	0.09
3日	0.20	0.05	1.14	0.09	0.35	0.08	0.15	0.19
6日	0.16	0.01	0.41	0.03	0.15	0.02	0.03	0.02
7日	0.05	0.01	0.46	0.03	0.04	0.02	0.03	0.01
8日	0.06	0.02	0.45	0.02	0.04	0.02	0.02	0.01
12日	0.03	0.01	0.28	0.03	0.02	0.01	0.02	0.02
13日	0.03	0.01	0.35	0.03	0.02	0.01	0.02	0.02
14日	0.18	0.17	2.27	0.15	0.54	0.38	0.39	0.44
18日	0.04	0.02	0.40	0.03	0.03	0.03	0.03	0.02
21日	0.06	0.02	0.43	0.03	0.04	0.02	0.03	0.02
24日	0.03	0.01	0.21	0.02	0.02	0.01	0.01	0.01
25日	0.11	0.02	0.78	0.07	0.14	0.04	0.08	0.09
26日	0.02	0.02	0.23	0.03	0.05	0.03	0.03	0.05
月平均	0.04	0.02	0.35	0.03	0.05	0.03	0.03	0.04

电厂浓度值	污染物日均影响值/(μg·m^-3)					污染物日均减少比例/(%)
电厂浓度值	PM_2.5	SO₂	NO₂	CO	PM₁₀	SO₂	NO₂	CO	PM_2.5	PM₁₀
配套电厂	0.020	0.041	0.016	0.354	0.026	0.050	0.020	0.030	0.020	0.020
虚拟电厂	-0.136	-0.429	-0.096	-3.667	-0.154	-0.500	-0.160	-0.320	-0.180	-0.160
差值	0.116	0.388	0.080	3.313	0.128	0.450	0.140	0.290	0.160	0.140

[1]	Wei GUO, Ling-yun ZHU, Wen-ya WANG, Xing-ai GAO, Peng-wei CHENG, Yue-jun ZHANG. Evaluation of air quality improvement in Taiyuan during Second National Youth Games [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2021, 37(6): 36-43.
[2]	Min XU. Numerical simulation on the spatiotemporal distribution of PM_2.5 in the Yangtze River Delta [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2021, 37(4): 33-39.
[3]	Yu ZHOU,Hong-xing HAN,Chen-xiao SHI,Jun XING,Li SUN. Comparative analysis of aerosol mass concentration characteristics in winter and spring during 2016 to 2017 in three cities of Hainan province [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2020, 36(6): 82-90.
[4]	Yang-feng WANG,Yan-jun MA,Wei-jun QUAN,Rong-ping LI. Progress of the application research of air quality models in Northeast China [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2020, 36(6): 130-136.
[5]	Hong-rui ZHU,He-nan LIU,Hong-ling ZHANG,Chang-jiao YIN. Change characteristics of atmospheric self-purification capability in Heilongjiang province from 2008 to 2018 [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2020, 36(4): 89-94.
[6]	Xing-xing GAO, Hai-lin GUI, Liu-jie PAN, Nan WANG, Jian-peng WANG. Statistical analysis of air pollution in Fenwei Plain based on satellite remote sensing and ground observation data [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2020, 36(4): 36-44.
[7]	ZHENG Qing-feng, SHI Jun, DONG Guang-tao, HUANG Wen-juan, XU Wei-zhong, WANG Quan-yuan. Characteristics of air quality index and its correlation with meteorological parameters in Shanghai [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2019, 35(5): 53-62.
[8]	ZHAO Lei, WU Kun-ti, CHEN Ming. Characteristics of air quality in Haikou from 2013 to 2016 and pollutant source analysis during typical pollution events [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2019, 35(5): 63-69.
[9]	YANG Dong, ZHU Jia-min, YAO Ri-sheng, TU Xiao-ping. Comparison of air quality and atmospheric self-purification capacity between coastal and inland areas of Ningbo [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2019, 35(3): 52-59.
[10]	ZHANG Ying-ying, CHEN Ming, CHEN Li-ying. Potential source analysis of heavy pollution weather in Haikou [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2019, 35(2): 107-111.
[11]	ZHU Hong-rui, LIU He-nan, ZHANG Hong-ling, YIN Chang-jiao. Characteristics of air quality and its relationship with meteorological factors in Harbin [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2019, 35(1): 53-58.
[12]	DONG Zhen-hua, QI Yi-ling, KONG Hai-jiang. Comparison analysis of three heavy pollution events in He'nan province [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2019, 35(1): 18-25.
[13]	ZHU Yi-meng, GUO Zhen-dong. The study on impact of air humidifier on indoor air quality [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2018, 34(5): 163-168.
[14]	LU Zhong-yan; WANG Yang-feng;JIANG Da-kai;TENG Fang-da;DING Zhao-min;TIAN Li. Study on forecast method of air quality in Shenyang based on meteorological conditions [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2018, 34(4): 68-74.
[15]	AN Lin-chang, ZHANG Heng-de, LI Kai-fei. Analysis of effect of precipitation events on air pollutant concentration [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2018, 34(3): 58-70.

Influence of the ultra-high voltage cross-regional transmission on air quality

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 9

References 41

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0