基于数据窗口标准差的边界层高度反演方法——以上海市为例

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2021.02.015

气象与环境学报 ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 107-112.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2021.02.015

• 快报 • 上一篇

基于数据窗口标准差的边界层高度反演方法——以上海市为例

王芃¹(),谈建国^2,*(),束炯¹,彭杰³

1. 华东师范大学地理信息科学重点实验室(教育部), 上海 200241
2. 上海市气候中心, 上海 200030
3. 上海市生态气象和卫星遥感中心, 上海 200030

收稿日期:2020-06-28 出版日期:2021-04-01 发布日期:2021-04-02
通讯作者: 谈建国 E-mail:pwang0812@163.com;jianguot@21cn.com
作者简介:王芃, 女, 1994年生, 在读硕士研究生, 主要从事大气边界层方面的研究, E-mail: pwang0812@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(41775019)

Boundary layer height inversion method based on data window standard deviation: a case study in Shanghai

Peng WANG¹(),Jian-guo TAN^2,*(),Jiong SHU¹,Jie PENG³

1. Key Laboratory of Geographic Information Science, East China Normal University(Ministry of Education), Shanghai 200241, China
2. Shanghai Climate Center, Shanghai 200030, China
3. Shanghai Ecological Meteorology and Satellite Remote Sensing Center, Shanghai 200030, China

Received:2020-06-28 Online:2021-04-01 Published:2021-04-02
Contact: Jian-guo TAN E-mail:pwang0812@163.com;jianguot@21cn.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

大气边界层具备一个重要特性，即在边界层顶部，气溶胶浓度在垂直分布上存在显著突变。利用该特性，采用主动遥感装置经过窗口平滑去除噪点后数据，提出基于梯度法改进的大气边界层高度反演方法——窗口标准偏差法。基于激光云高仪后向散射廓线数据，利用该方法反演边界层高度，在边界层高度下大气气溶胶混合均匀时，反演结果较为理想。在此基础上，将窗口标准偏差法反演结果与逐步曲线拟合法反演结果进行比较。结果表明：两种方法具有较好的相关性，相关系数为0.94。两种方法产生差异的原因在于窗口标准偏差法不考虑夹卷层厚度而逐步曲线拟合法考虑夹卷层厚度。窗口标准偏差法可以降低高空背景光噪音对反演结果的影响。通过该方法反演出的边界层高度，在时间序列上具有连续性强的特点，反演结果更有利于研究大气边界层高度的时间变化趋势。

关键词: 激光雷达, 边界层高度反演, 标准偏差, 滑动窗口, 云高仪

Abstract:

The atmospheric boundary layer has an important feature, that is, at the top of the boundary layer, there is a significant abrupt change in the vertical distribution of aerosol concentration.Using this feature, the active remote sensing device is used to remove the noise data through window smoothing, and an improved atmospheric boundary layer height inversion method based on gradient method-the window standard deviation method was proposed.Based on the backscattering profile data of the laser ceilometer, this method was used to retrieve the height of the boundary layer.In the case when the atmospheric aerosol is uniformly mixed at the boundary layer height, the inversion result is ideal.On this basis, comparing the inversion results of the window standard deviation method with the inversion results of the stepwise curve fitting method, it is found that the two methods have a good correlation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.94.The reason for the difference between the two methods is that the window standard deviation method does not consider the thickness of the entrainment layer while the stepwise curve fitting method considers the thickness of the entrainment layer.The window standard deviation method can reduce the influence of high-altitude background light noise on the inversion results.The height of the boundary layer retrieved by this method has the characteristics of strong continuity in time series, and the inversion results are more conducive to the study of the temporal change trend of the height of the atmospheric boundary layer.

Key words: Lidar, Boundary layer height inversion, Standard deviation, Sliding window, Ceilometer

中图分类号:

P404

王芃,谈建国,束炯,彭杰. 基于数据窗口标准差的边界层高度反演方法——以上海市为例[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2021, 37(2): 107-112.

Peng WANG,Jian-guo TAN,Jiong SHU,Jie PENG. Boundary layer height inversion method based on data window standard deviation: a case study in Shanghai[J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2021, 37(2): 107-112.

图/表 6

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表1

参考文献 13

1	Stull R B . An introduction to boundary layer meteorology[M]. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer, 1988.
2	廖国莲. 大气混合层厚度的计算方法及影响因子[J]. 中山大学研究生学刊: 自然科学、医学版, 2005, 26 (4): 66- 73.
3	周书华, 倪长健, 刘培川. 成都地区大气边界层逆温特征分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2015, 31 (2): 108- 111.
4	贾健, 杨佩琪, 蒋慧敏. 乌鲁木齐市日最大边界层高度变化特征分析及其与空气质量的关系[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2019, 35 (2): 55- 60. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2019.02.008
5	Holzworth G C . Estimates of mean maximum mixing depths in the contiguous united states[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 1964, 92 (5): 235- 242. doi: 10.1175/1520-0493(1964)092<0235:EOMMMD>2.3.CO;2
6	王栋成, 邱粲, 董旭光, 等. 偏离度法确定济南夏季对流边界层高度研究[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2019, 35 (3): 29- 36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2019.03.004
7	张春光, 张玉钧, 韩道文, 等. 测云技术研究进展[J]. 光散射学报, 2007, 19 (4): 388- 394. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-5929.2007.04.017
8	陈臻懿, 刘文清, 张玉钧, 等. 用云高仪测量边界层高度[J]. 激光技术, 2009, 33 (5): 455- 458. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3806.2009.05.003
9	Steyn D G , Baldi M , Hoff R M . The detection of mixed layer depth and entrainment zone thickness from lidar backscatter profiles[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 1999, 16 (7): 953- 959. doi: 10.1175/1520-0426(1999)016<0953:TDOMLD>2.0.CO;2
10	Peng J , Grimmond C S B , Fu X S , et al. Ceilometer-based analysis of Shanghai's boundary layer height(under rain-and fog-free conditions)[J]. Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology, 2017, 34 (4): 749- 764. doi: 10.1175/JTECH-D-16-0132.1
11	Sawyer V , Li Z Q . Detection, variations and intercomparison of the planetary boundary layer depth from radiosonde, lidar and infrared spectrometer[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2013, (79): 518- 528.
12	何俊峰, 刘文清, 张玉钧, 等. 一种半导体激光云高仪时序控制和信号处理方案[J]. 光电工程, 2011, 38 (6): 24- 29. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-501X.2011.06.005
13	Collier C G . The impact of urban areas on weather[J]. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society, 2006, 132 (614): 1- 25. doi: 10.1256/qj.05.199

日期时刻	6月7日		6月8日		6月16日		6月18日
日期时刻	07时	19时	07时	19时	07时	19时	07时	19时
窗口标准偏差	530	460	220	570	830	600	400	650
逐步曲线拟合	530	300	230	580	860	670	450	650
探空数据	650	370	300	580	920	790	550	700

[1]	尹青,何金海,张华. 激光雷达在气象和大气环境监测中的应用[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2009, 25(5): 48-55.
[2]	黄艇,宋煜,肖韶荣,盖晓波. 2007年冬季大连市区气溶胶垂直剖面特征[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2009, 25(4): 31-35.

基于数据窗口标准差的边界层高度反演方法——以上海市为例

Boundary layer height inversion method based on data window standard deviation: a case study in Shanghai

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 6

参考文献 13

相关文章 2

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10