渤海西岸空气动力学粗糙度特征分析

气象与环境学报 ›› 2014, Vol. 30 ›› Issue (3): 26-30.doi:

渤海西岸空气动力学粗糙度特征分析

黄鹤¹吴彬贵¹蔡子颖¹王佳²严俊³

1．天津市气象科学研究所，天津 300061；2. 南京信息工程大学，江苏南京 210044；3. 天津市静海气象局，天津静海 301600

出版日期:2014-06-28 发布日期:2014-06-28

Analysis of aerodynamic roughness in the western coast of the Bohai Sea

HUANG He¹ WU Bin-gui¹ CAI Zi-ying¹ WANG Jia² YAN Jun³

1. Tianjin Institute of Meteorological Science, Tianjin 300061, China; 2. Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology, Nanjing 210044, China; 3. Meteorological Service in Jinghai District of Tianjin, Tianjin 301600, China

Online:2014-06-28 Published:2014-06-28

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用2009年12月至2010年11月渤海西岸大港风能塔观测得到的风速、风向和温度梯度资料，计算了风能塔周围空气动力学粗糙度Z0。对比分析了风廓线法和风速标准差法的计算结果，讨论了风速标准差法的适用性以及下垫面空间非均一性对粗糙度的影响。结果表明：风能塔三个主风向上的平均粗糙长度为：0.1319m(N)，0.0386m(SE)和0.0182m(SW)。通过严格条件限制，利用风速标准差法可以得到与风廓线法相同的计算效果。同一方位上，利用10—30 m资料计算得到的粗糙度长度的季节差异相对较小，而50—70 m的计算结果差异相对较大。在相同高度上，粗糙度长度计算结果亦存在明显季节差异，反映了随季节变化的植被对地表粗糙度的影响。

关键词: 风能塔, 空气动力学粗糙度, 风廓线, 下垫面

Abstract:

Based on the observed wind speed, wind direction and temperature data from wind energy tower at Dagang in the western coast of the Bohai Sea from December of 2009 to November of 2010, the aerodynamic roughnessZ0 around the wind energy tower was calculated using two methods: a wind-profile and a wind speed standard deviation. The results are analyzed and compared. The applicability of the wind speed standard deviation method and the effect of the inhomogeneous underlying surface on the roughness were discussed. The results show that the average roughnesses on three main wind directions are 0.1319 m (north), 0.0386 m (south-east) and 0.0182 m (south-west), respectively. The roughness calculated using the two methods could be similar if a strictly condition control is carried out. On the same direction, the seasonal differences of the roughness calculated by the two methods using 10-30 m meteorological data are not significant, while those using the 50-70m data are significant. On the same layer, the differences of the roughness between different seasons are significant, which reflects the effect of the seasonal vegetation change on the roughness.

Key words: Wind energy tower, Aerodynamic roughness, Wind profile, Underlying layer

黄鹤,吴彬贵,蔡子颖,王佳,严俊. 渤海西岸空气动力学粗糙度特征分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2014, 30(3): 26-30.

HUANG He, WU Bin-gui, CAI Zi-ying, WANG Jia, YAN Jun. Analysis of aerodynamic roughness in the western coast of the Bohai Sea[J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2014, 30(3): 26-30.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Reference Manager|ProCite|BibTeX|RefWorks

链接本文: http://www.jme1984.net.cn/CN/

http://www.jme1984.net.cn/CN/Y2014/V30/I3/26

[1]	万瑜;曹兴;杨莲梅. 中亚低涡背景下中天山地区一次短时强降水过程中尺度特征[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2018, 34(4): 1-10.
[2]	黄思源, 王界, 全彩峰. 2015年宁波地区两次灰霾天气过程气溶胶垂直分布特征分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2017, 33(3): 45-51.
[3]	颜玉倩, 朱克云, 张杰, 徐铖. 成都地区春季一次持续性灰霾天气过程特征及预测[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2016, 32(1): 33-39.
[4]	李英,卢萍. 基于通量方差法对青藏高原东侧高寒草甸地表通量的估算[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2014, 30(6): 134-140.
[5]	卢焕珍,刘一玮, 张楠 . 海河流域切变线类暴雨成因分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2014, 30(1): 15-22.
[6]	陈楠，胡明宝，徐芬，孙磊，李妙英. 一次降雨过程风廓线雷达特征[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2012, 28(5): 19-.
[7]	徐璐璐，李慧琳，孙连强，李倩. 2010年8月丹东连续两次副热带高压暴雨多普勒雷达资料对比分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2012, 28(4): 49-54.
[8]	郑石, 黄兴友, 李艳芳. 一次短时暴雨WP-3000边界层风廓线雷达回波与多普勒雷达回波分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2011, 27(3): 6-11.
[9]	胡张保,俞炳丰. 城市下垫面空气动力学参数确定方法研究综述[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2008, 24(5): 55-60.
[10]	高媛媛,何金海,王自发. 城市化进程对北京区域气象场的影响模拟[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2007, 23(3): 58-64.
[11]	张春玉. 桃仙机场一次大雾天气过程浅析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2002, 18(2): 16-17.
[12]	肇启锋,朱凯全. 对桃仙机场一次大雾天气过程的分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 1999, 15(4): 14-14.