基于舒适度指数的重庆地区四类养生气候适宜度分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2023.02.014

气象与环境学报 ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 107-112.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2023.02.014

• 快报 • 上一篇

基于舒适度指数的重庆地区四类养生气候适宜度分析

彭韵萌^1,²(),钟燕川^3,*(),何军^1,²,夏佰成^1,²,张继^2,⁴,王远谋^1,²,王凯嘉^1,²

1. 重庆市气象服务中心，重庆 401147
2. 中国气象局气候资源经济转化重点开放实验室，重庆 401147
3. 四川省气候中心，四川成都 610072
4. 重庆市气象科学研究所，重庆 401147

收稿日期:2022-08-22 出版日期:2023-04-28 发布日期:2023-05-20
通讯作者: 钟燕川 E-mail:2414979401@qq.com;16063835@qq.com
作者简介:彭韵萌，女，1994年生，工程师，主要从事区域气候变化、旅游气象服务方面研究，E-mail: 2414979401@qq.com

Analysis of suitable areas of four types of health-preserving climate in Chongqing based on the climate comfort index

Yun-meng PENG^1,²(),Yan-chuan ZHONG^3,*(),Jun HE^1,²,Bai-cheng XIA^1,²,Ji ZHANG^2,⁴,Yuan-mou WANG^1,²,Kai-jia WANG^1,²

1. Chongqing Meteorological Service Center, Chongqing 401147, China
2. China Meteorological Administration Economic Transformation of Climate Resources Key Laboratory, Chongqing 401147, China
3. Sichuan Climate Center, Chengdu 610072, China
4. Chongqing Institute of Meteorological Science, Chongqing 401147, China

Received:2022-08-22 Online:2023-04-28 Published:2023-05-20
Contact: Yan-chuan ZHONG E-mail:2414979401@qq.com;16063835@qq.com

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

选取1980—2020年重庆地区逐日平均温度、相对湿度、风速、日照时数等观测资料，基于温湿指数和风效指数对重庆各地的气候适宜度进行计算。应用克里金插值法分析重庆地区气候适宜度的空间分布特征，并对重庆地区四季温和型、夏令避暑型、冬令避寒型、日光疗养型四类养生气候进行了适宜度分析。结果表明：重庆地区四季温和型气候适宜度地区主要集中在重庆东北部和重庆东南部。城口县全年体感舒适天数最多，是重庆地区气候最温和的地区。适合夏季避暑的地区主要在重庆东南部，如酉阳、秀山、彭水南部、黔江南部等。除重庆东南部分地区外，其他大部地区均适合冬季避寒。重庆日光疗养型养生气候舒适度水平呈“东高西低”的分布，东部适宜日光疗养的地区偏多，西部较少。

关键词: 温湿指数, 风效指数, 克里金插值

Abstract:

Based on the daily meteorological data including average temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and sunshine hours in Chongqing from the national meteorological sciences data center during 1980-2020, the climate comfort was calculated by adopting the temperature-humidity index and wind efficiency index.The spatial distribution characteristics of climate comfort and the suitable areas of the four types of health-preserving climate i.e.the all-season-mild, the summer resort, the winter hibernation, and the sunlight health-preserving in Chongqing area were analyzed using the Kriging interpolation method.Results indicate that the all-season-mild is concentrated in the northeastern and southeastern of Chongqing which are suitable for tourism, health care, and other health activities throughout the year.Chengkou has the most comfortable days in the year and is the most comfortable area in Chongqing.At the same time, the summer resort is focused on the southeast of Chongqing, such as Youyang, Xiushan, the south of Pengshui, and Qianjiang.Furthermore, most areas are suitable for hibernation except the southeastern of Chongqing.While the climate comfort level of sunlight recuperation shows the distribution of "high in the east and low in the west", that is, the suitable area of sunlight recuperation in the eastern area is more than in western Chongqing.

Key words: Temperature-humidity index, Wind efficiency index, Kriging interpolation method

中图分类号:

P463

彭韵萌,钟燕川,何军,夏佰成,张继,王远谋,王凯嘉. 基于舒适度指数的重庆地区四类养生气候适宜度分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2023, 39(2): 107-112.

Yun-meng PENG,Yan-chuan ZHONG,Jun HE,Bai-cheng XIA,Ji ZHANG,Yuan-mou WANG,Kai-jia WANG. Analysis of suitable areas of four types of health-preserving climate in Chongqing based on the climate comfort index[J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2023, 39(2): 107-112.

图/表 8

图1

表1

图2

图3

图4

图5

表2

图6

参考文献 31

1	李正泉, 肖晶晶, 马浩, 等. 丽水市生态气候休闲养生适宜性分析[J]. 气象与环境科学, 2016, 39 (3): 104- 111.
2	郝永娟, 吐尔逊·哈斯木, 杨家军. 干旱环境背景下的城市人居环境适宜性评价——以新疆巴州为例[J]. 四川师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 38 (3): 466- 474.
3	王凯, 高媛, 刘敏, 等. 利川市旅游气候适宜性的评价和比较[J]. 气象科技进展, 2018, 8 (5): 101- 104. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1973.2018.05.017
4	Perch-Nielsen S L , Amelung B , Knutti R . Future climate resources for tourism in Europe based on the daily Tourism Climatic Index[J]. Climate Change, 2010, 103, 363- 381. doi: 10.1007/s10584-009-9772-2
5	任学慧, 李颖, 王健. 近60 a北方沿海城市人居环境气候舒适性评价——以辽宁省为例[J]. 自然资源学报, 2013, 28 (5): 811- 821.
6	徐静, 卢宪梅, 刘志刚, 等. 1966—2018年秦皇岛气候舒适度时空变化特征[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2020, 36 (3): 80- 86.
7	张青, 李颖, 骆月珍, 等. 杭州地区人体舒适度对自然死亡人数的影响[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2017, 33 (3): 101- 106. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2017.03.013
8	姚鹏, 赵清扬, 张梦竹, 等. 近37年成都地区基于温湿指数的气候舒适度变化特征分析[J]. 高原山地气象研究, 2019, 39 (1): 61- 66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-2184.2019.01.010
9	Hougthton F C , Yaglou C P . Determining equal comfort lines[J]. Journal of the American Society of Heating and Ventilating Engineers, 1923, 29, 165- 176.
10	Houghton F C , Yaglaglou C P , Sayers R R . Effective temperatures for still-air conditions and their application to mining[J]. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 1924, 197 (3): 411- 412.
11	Li P W , Chan S T . Application of a weather stress index for alerting the public to stressful weather in Hong Kong[J]. Meteorological Applications, 2000, 7 (4): 369- 375. doi: 10.1017/S1350482700001602
12	Yaglou C P , Minard D . Control of heat casualties at military training centers[J]. A.M.A.Archives of Industrial Health, 1957, 16 (4): 302- 316.
13	Thom E C . A new concept for cooling degree-days[J]. Air conditioning, Heating and Ventilation, 1957, 54, 73- 80.
14	Siple P A , Passel C F . Measurement of Dry Atmospheric Cooling in Subfreezing Temperatures[J]. Proceedings of American Philosophical Society, 1945, 89 (1): 177- 199.
15	Terjung W H . Physiologic climates of the contentious United States: A bioclimatic classification based on man[J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 1966, 56 (1): 141- 179.
16	Nairn J R , Fawcett R J B . The excess heat factor: a metric for heatwave intensity and its use in classifying heatwave severity[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2015, 12 (1): 227- 253.
17	Kim H S , Chung Y S , Cho J H . Long-term variations of dust storms and associated dustfall and related climate factors in Korea during 1997~2016[J]. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2017, 10, 1269- 1280.
18	Chung Y S , Kim H S . Observations on changes in Korean Changma rain associated with climate warming in 2017 and 2018[J]. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2019, 12, 197- 215.
19	Li M M , Zhou M G , Yang J , et al. Temperature, temperature extremes, and cause-specific respiratory mortality in China: a multi-city time series analysis[J]. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2019, 12, 539- 548.
20	Cetin M . Climate comfort depending on different altitudes and land use in the urban areas in Kahramanmaras City[J]. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 2020, 13, 991- 999.
21	冯晓钰, 周广胜. 1969—2018年金华市舒适度和冷/热日特征分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2020, 36 (6): 108- 114.
22	金琪, 孟英杰. 1960—2016年武汉城市圈人体舒适度变化特征[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2017, 33 (6): 82- 88.
23	王汶, 鲁旭. 基于GIS的人居环境气候舒适度评价——以河南省为例[J]. 遥感信息, 2009, (2): 104- 109.
24	马丽君, 孙根年, 杨睿, 等. 城市气候舒适度与游客网络关注度时空相关分析[J]. 地理科学进展, 2011, 30 (6): 753- 759.
25	马丽君, 孙根年, 马耀峰, 等. 气候舒适度对热点城市入境游客时空变化的影响[J]. 旅游学刊, 2011, 26 (1): 45- 50.
26	冯粉粉, 温家洪, 王慧敏. 基于GIS的华东地区旅游气候舒适度分析[J]. 上海师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 41 (2): 196- 202.
27	姜继兰, 韩琳. 基于ArcGIS的四川地区城市气候舒适度评价[J]. 成都信息工程大学学报, 2018, 33 (3): 318- 325.
28	何静, 田永中, 高阳华, 等. 重庆山地人居环境气候适宜性评价[J]. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 32 (9): 100- 106.
29	张立文, 李百战, 高亚锋, 等. 重庆市特征气候的舒适性分析[J]. 制冷与空调(四川), 2009, 23 (5): 22- 25.
30	吉莉, 李家启, 苟思, 等. 重庆地区人体舒适度日数时空变化特征[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2014, 30 (1): 88- 94.
31	张仁铎. 空间变异理论及应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2005.

风效指数K值	温湿指数I值	评价等级	评价标识符
K≤-1000	I < 40	暴冷或酷冷(很不舒适)	E
-1000 < K≤-800	40≤I < 45	寒冷(不舒适)	D
-800 < K≤-600	45≤I < 55	偏冷或凉偏冷(较不舒适)	C
-600 < K≤-300	55≤I < 60	凉(较舒适)	B
-300 < K≤-200	60≤I < 65	最舒适	A
-200 < K≤-50	65≤I < 70	暖(较舒适)	b
-50 < K≤80	70≤I < 75	偏热或暖偏热(较不舒适)	c
80 < K≤160	75≤I < 80	热或闷热(不舒适)	d
K>160	I≥80	暴热或极闷热(很不舒适)	e

评分(G)	≥5	4	3	2	1	0
舒适度	很适宜	适宜	较适宜	较不适宜	不适宜	很不适宜

基于舒适度指数的重庆地区四类养生气候适宜度分析

Analysis of suitable areas of four types of health-preserving climate in Chongqing based on the climate comfort index

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 8

参考文献 31

相关文章 1

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 0