Journal of Meteorology and Environment ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 74-83.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2023.04.010
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Suyao WANG1(),Xueliang DENG2,Jianlin HU3,Luyu CHANG4
Received:
2021-05-27
Online:
2023-08-28
Published:
2023-09-23
CLC Number:
Suyao WANG,Xueliang DENG,Jianlin HU,Luyu CHANG. Research on atmospheric synoptic classification of heavy pollution weather during winter half year from 2015 to 2018 in Huaibei city[J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2023, 39(4): 74-83.
Fig.3
Uniform pressure field in front of high pressure (a), uniform pressure field under high pressure control (b), behind the cold front type (c), weak cold air type from East Road (d) and uniform pressure field at the bottom of low pressure (e) for objective classification in formation stage from 2016 to 2018 in Huaibei city"
Fig.4
Uniform pressure field in front of the bottom of high pressure of I (a) and II (b), uniform pressure field in the east of high pressure (c), uniform pressure field at the bottom of high pressure of I (d) and II (f), wide range uniform pressure field (e) for objective classification in maintenance stage from 2016 to 2018 in Huaibei city"
Fig.5
Uniform pressure field at the bottom of high pressure (a), uniform pressure field in front of the bottom of high pressure (b), uniform pressure field controlled by high pressure (c), uniform pressure field in front of high pressure (d) for objective classification in the dissipation stage from 2016 to 2018 in Huaibei city"
Table 1
Comparative analysis of circulation types and meteorological elements at the formation, maintenance, and end of persistent heavy pollution weather process from 2016 to 2018 in Huaibei city"
重污染天气阶段 | 环流类型及占比/(%) | 海平面气压值占比/(%)(淮北) | 风向占比/(%)(淮北) | 风速占比/(%)(淮北) | 气压梯度/(hPa)(安徽省) |
形成期 | 冷高压前沿(10%) 均压场(90%) | 1022~1026 hPa(80%) 1030 hPa(20%) | NE(70%) ENE(20%) E(10%) | ≤2 m·s-1(80%) 静风(20%) | < 2.5 hPa |
维持期 | 均压场(100%) | 1020~1026 hPa | E(39.6%) N(28.3%) WN(9.4%) NE(18.2%) SE(3.1%) W(1.3%) | 静风(95.6%) | < 2 hPa |
结束期 | 冷高压前沿(85%) 均压场(15%) | 1025~1028 hPa | NE(80%) SE(15%) WN(5%) | 2─4 m·s-1 | 2~5 hPa(85%) < 2 hPa(15%) |
1 |
邓雪娇,黄健,吴兑,等.深圳地区典型大气污染过程分析[J].中国环境科学,2006,26(z1):7-11.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-6923.2006.z1.003 |
2 | 张蓬勃,金琼,陆晓波,等.2013年1月持续性霾天气中影响污染程度的气象条件分析[J].气象科学,2016,36(1):112-120. |
3 | 郭蕊,段浩,马翠平,等.河北中南部连续12 d重霾污染天气过程特征及影响因素分析[J].气象,2016,42(5):589-597. |
4 |
肖悦,田永中,许文轩,等.近10年中国空气质量时空分布特征[J].生态环境学报,2017,26(2):243-252.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2017.02.009 |
5 | 王继康,花丛,桂海林,等.2016年1月我国中东部一次大气污染物传输过程分析[J].气象,2017,43(7):804-812. |
6 | 张枫逸.常态化雾霾呼唤常态化治理[J].环境教育,2013,(11):15. |
7 | 徐宁. 空气污染对公众健康的危害——基于面板数据的实证分析[D]. 大连: 东北财经大学, 2015. |
8 |
丁剑平.大气污染危害性分析及治理途径[J].科技展望,2014,(22):254.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-8289.2014.22.211 |
9 | 周慧,王自发,安俊岭,等.城市空气污染持续维持机制研究I.2002年西安市空气污染持续维持过程分析及其气象成因[J].气候与环境研究,2005,10(1):124-131. |
10 | 陈训来,范绍佳,李江南,等.香港地区空气污染的典型天气背景形势[J].热带气象学报,2008,24(2):195-199. |
11 | 吴兑.灰霾天气的形成与演化[J].环境科学与技术,2011,34(3):157-161. |
12 | 张滢滢,陈明,陈丽英.海口市重污染天气潜在源分析研究[J].气象与环境学报,2019,35(2):107-111. |
13 | 石春娥,姚叶青,张平,等.合肥市PM10输送轨迹分类研究[J].高原气象,2008,27(6):1383-1391. |
14 | 杨浩,白永清,刘琳,等.基于轨迹聚类河南地区大气污染过程空气输送通道研究[J].气象与环境学报,2017,33(4):29-39. |
15 | 赵蕾,吴坤悌,陈明.2013—2016年海口市空气质量特征及典型个例污染物来源分析[J].气象与环境学报,2019,35(5):63-69. |
16 | 王郭臣,王东启,陈振楼.北京冬季严重污染过程的PM2.5污染特征和输送路径及潜在源区[J].中国环境科学,2016,36(7):1931-1937. |
17 | 徐丹妮,王瑾婷,袁自冰,等.汾渭平原复杂地形影响下冬季PM2.5污染分布特征、来源及成因分析[J].环境科学学报,2021,41(4):1184-1198. |
18 | 高书然.空气中SO2浓度变化与气象因素的关系[J].环境科学,1979,(3):1-8. |
19 | 王莉莉,王跃思,王迎红,等.北京夏末秋初不同天气形势对大气污染物浓度的影响[J].中国环境科学,2010,30(7):924-930. |
20 | 王明洁,贺佳佳,王书欣,等.基于AQI的深圳大气污染特征及其典型环流形势分析[J].生态环境学报,2018,27(2):268-275. |
21 | 许建明,常炉予,马井会,等.上海秋冬季PM2.5污染天气形势的客观分型研究[J].环境科学学报,2016,36(12):4303-4314. |
22 | 杨浩,许冠宇,白永清,等.湖北省近两年冬季月份PM2.5污染天气型特征及其与大尺度环流的相关研究[J].气象,2018,44(11):1454-1463. |
23 | 常炉予,许建明,瞿元昊,等.上海市臭氧污染的大气环流客观分型研究[J].环境科学学报,2019,39(1):169-179. |
24 | 常美玉,向卫国,钱骏,等.成渝地区空气重污染天气形势分析[J].环境科学学报,2020,40(1):43-57. |
25 | 陆汇丞,马翠平,赵天良,等.基于PCT方法的京津冀冬季PM2.5重污染天气型分析[J].环境科学学报,2021,41(3):898-904. |
26 | 王琼,沈瑞珊,庞杨.河北省重污染天气分型及其预报概念模型研究[J].气象与环境科学,2020,43(4):105-112. |
27 | HuthR.An intercomparison of computer-assisted circulation classification methods[J].International Journal of Climatology,1996,16(8):893-922. |
28 | DraxlerR R,HessG D.An overview of the HYSPLIT_4 modeling system of trajectories, dispersion, and deposition[J].Australian Meteorological Magazine,1998,47,295-308. |
29 | ChenL L,CarmichaelG R,HongM S,et al.Influence of continental outflow events on the aerosol composition at Cheju Island, South Korea[J].Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres,1997,102(D23):28551-28574. |
30 | WangY Q.An open source software suite for multi-dimensional meteorological data computation and visualisation[J].Journal of Open Research Software,2019,7(1):21. |
31 | 张晓东,王冠,王秀玲,等.2016—2019年唐山市臭氧污染及其与气象条件的关系[J].气象与环境学报,2022,38(2):62-69. |
32 | 马瑞丰,许敬红,严良政,等.2013—2018年大连中心城区臭氧时空变化及其影响因子分析[J].气象与环境学报,2022,38(3):75-84. |
[1] | Hong XU,Junqing CHEN,Haijun LU,Mingkun SONG,Xiwu CHEN,Qiang GONG,Ling ZHU,Lidu SHEN. Analysis of the weather characteristics of a sand-dust event in Northern China from March 27 to 28, 2021 [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2023, 39(4): 9-16. |
[2] | Junxiu WANG,Junjie WANG,Xiantao HAN,Caiyun YANG,Xuegong JIANG,Rong LI,Kewen ZHANG. Characterization analysis of the severe dust pollution event in Hohhot in March 2021 based on multi-source data [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2023, 39(4): 17-24. |
[3] | Wei WU,Tie-liang SHAN. Transport and case study of heavy air pollution in Luohe during autumn and winter using backward trajectory analysis [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2022, 38(3): 65-74. |
[4] | Qing CAO,Xiao-ping GU,Chi-peng ZHANG,Zhen-hong CHEN,Zhe-hong WU. Meteorological transport conditions and spatial variations of contribution source for PM2.5 in Anshun of Guizhou province [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2022, 38(2): 55-61. |
[5] | Rong MAI, Yang YANG, Gen-chang FAN, Feng LV, Xiao-bo DONG, Miao LIANG, Bo YAO. Characteristics of the vertical distribution of CH4 in the troposphere in autumn in Shijiazhuang based on aircraft observations [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2022, 38(2): 70-77. |
[6] | Hao YIN, Jun-ling TAN, Ju-yong WANG, Hong-quan LI, Lei XI, Bin WU, Ji-dong QIU. Analysis of PM2.5 concentration changes and transmission characteristics in Huzhou city [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2021, 37(5): 20-26. |
[7] | YANG Dong, ZHU Jia-min, YAO Ri-sheng, TU Xiao-ping. Comparison of air quality and atmospheric self-purification capacity between coastal and inland areas of Ningbo [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2019, 35(3): 52-59. |
[8] | HUO Yan-feng, DENG Xue-liang, GONG Zhong-qiang, YANG Guan-ying, SUN Qiang, ZHAI Jing, YU Cai-xia. Formation analysis of a heavy dust pollution event in the Yangtze River Delta in May 2017 [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2019, 35(1): 26-34. |
[9] | QIU Hui-min, ZHOU Cheng-long, YANG Fan, MA Kai, YE Xiao-ting, ZHOU Xue-ying. Analysis of a typical regional sand-dust event over the eastern Tarim Basin [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2018, 34(2): 19-27. |
[10] | CHEN Bo-li, LEI Zheng-cui, WU Jian-qiu, WU Jing-lu, HUANG Wen-yan. Analysis on a persistent haze process in Changzhou [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2016, 32(3): 34-40. |
[11] | QI Dong-lin,ZHANG Jia-kun,LI Xiao-dong,WEI Hong-ye, WANG Li,MA Ming-liang, KONG Wei-qiang,XIAO Hong-bin,ZHANG Juan. Characteristics of air quality and its relationship with meteorological factors from 2001 to 2011 in Xi’ning [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2014, 30(2): 51-59. |
[12] | MA Liang-chen,LIU Hai-feng, WANG Ning,LI Hang-yue. 1. Changchun Meteorological Service, Changchun 130051, China; 2.Nanjing University of Information Science &Technology, Nanjing 210044, China [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2013, 29(6): 24-30. |
[13] | DOU Xiao-yan, XU Jia,HAN De-hui,ZHAO Xu-dong,CHEN Li,BAI Zhi-peng. Transportation characteristics of PM10 in the typical pollution weather in Xining [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2012, 28(2): 85-90. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||
|