Journal of Meteorology and Environment ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (6): 78-88.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2024.06.010
• Articles • Previous Articles Next Articles
Yonggang GAO1,2(),Fang WANG3,Yan WANG4,Junjie HAN1,2,Lixia JIANG1,2,Feng GAO2,5,Ming WANG1,2,Shengyang SUN3
Received:
2023-06-14
Online:
2024-12-28
Published:
2025-01-21
CLC Number:
Yonggang GAO,Fang WANG,Yan WANG,Junjie HAN,Lixia JIANG,Feng GAO,Ming WANG,Shengyang SUN. Effects of meteorological conditions on rice yield and nutritional quality in the Sanjiang Plain[J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2024, 40(6): 78-88.
Table 1
Changes in dry matter weight and yield structure elements by transplanting stage in rice, 2018-2019"
产量结构 | 2018年 | 2019年 | |||||||
TD1 | TD2 | TD3 | TD4 | TD1 | TD2 | TD3 | TD4 | ||
地上总干重/g | 70.03 | 76.88 | 72.14 | 61.77 | 70.51 | 72.75 | 69.74 | 68.39 | |
穗干重占地上总干重比率/(%) | 58.30 | 59.35 | 59.37 | 57.21 | 58.49 | 58.12 | 57.57 | 57.65 | |
株穗数/个 | 4.41 | 4.78 | 4.57 | 4.26 | 4.12 | 4.36 | 4.04 | 3.99 | |
穗粒数/粒 | 80 | 91 | 88 | 75 | 83 | 91 | 87 | 76 | |
千粒重/g | 24.94 | 24.37 | 24.04 | 23.43 | 22.98 | 24.31 | 23.49 | 22.45 |
Table 2
Friedman′s test P-value for amino acid content at each transplanting stage of rice, 2018-2019"
年份 | 处理 | 2018年 | 2019年 | |||||||
TD1 | TD2 | TD3 | TD4 | TD1 | TD2 | TD3 | TD4 | |||
2018年 | TD1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
TD2 | 0.001** | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
TD3 | 0.0001** | 0.0618 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
TD4 | 0.4883 | 0.0085** | 0.0001** | - | - | - | - | - | ||
2019年 | TD1 | 0.0001** | 0.0041** | 0.2992 | 0.0001** | - | - | - | - | |
TD2 | 0.0001** | 0.0001** | 0.0189* | 0.0001** | 0.1827 | - | - | - | ||
TD3 | 0.0001** | 0.0112* | 0.4883 | 0.0001** | 0.7287 | 0.0942 | - | - | ||
TD4 | 0.0001** | 0.0215* | 0.6557 | 0.0001** | 0.5524 | 0.0554 | 0.8043 | - |
Table 3
Friedman′s test P-value for fatty acid content at each transplanting stage of rice, 2018-2019"
年份 | 处理 | 2018年 | 2019年 | |||||||
TD1 | TD2 | TD3 | TD4 | TD1 | TD2 | TD3 | TD4 | |||
2018年 | TD1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | |
TD2 | 0.0002** | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
TD3 | 0.0086** | 0.2554 | - | - | - | - | - | - | ||
TD4 | 0.0001** | 0.0001** | 0.0001** | - | - | - | - | - | ||
2019年 | TD1 | 0.0001** | 0.0001** | 0.0001** | 0.0001** | - | - | - | - | |
TD2 | 0.0001** | 0.0001** | 0.0001** | 0.0001** | 0.9999 | - | - | - | ||
TD3 | 0.0001** | 0.0001** | 0.0001** | 0.0001** | 0.0005** | 0.0005** | - | - | ||
TD4 | 0.0001** | 0.0001** | 0.0001** | 0.0001** | 0.3759 | 0.3759 | 0.0086** | - |
Table 4
Correlation coefficients between amino acid content of rice at each transplanting stage and meteorological factors during the same period, 2018-2019"
氨基酸 | 移栽—成熟期 | 抽穗—乳熟期 | 孕穗—成熟期 | ||||||||||
T | Tmax | ΔT | P | Tmax | ΔT | P | S | Tmax | ΔT | P | |||
天冬氨酸 | -0.83** | -0.91** | -0.78* | 0.93** | -0.67* | -0.96** | 0.89** | -0.81** | -0.60 | -0.83** | 0.91** | ||
谷氨酸 | -0.75* | -0.88** | -0.73* | 0.92** | -0.64 | -0.94** | 0.86** | -0.73* | -0.58 | -0.85** | 0.90** | ||
丝氨酸 | -0.69* | -0.84** | -0.68* | 0.88** | -0.58 | -0.91** | 0.82** | -0.68* | -0.57 | -0.83** | 0.91** | ||
甘氨酸 | -0.65 | -0.80** | -0.64 | 0.87** | -0.57 | -0.88** | 0.80** | -0.62 | -0.50 | -0.81** | 0.85** | ||
组氨酸 | 0.50 | 0.45 | -0.15 | -0.47 | -0.13 | 0.27 | -0.53 | 0.15 | -0.20 | 0.57 | -0.37 | ||
精氨酸 | 0.08 | -0.12 | -0.30 | 0.24 | -0.27 | -0.32 | 0.15 | -0.03 | -0.26 | -0.20 | 0.29 | ||
苏氨酸 | -0.39 | -0.53 | -0.31 | 0.66 | -0.28 | -0.60 | 0.62 | -0.27 | -0.18 | -0.62 | 0.60 | ||
丙氨酸 | -0.68* | -0.80** | -0.69* | 0.87** | -0.56 | -0.86** | 0.81** | -0.60 | -0.46 | -0.81** | 0.84** | ||
脯氨酸 | 0.87** | 0.92** | 0.80** | -0.87** | 0.73* | 0.93** | -0.84** | 0.92** | 0.70* | 0.75* | -0.84** | ||
酪氨酸 | -0.57 | -0.72* | -0.65 | 0.79* | -0.55 | -0.83** | 0.71* | -0.61 | -0.54 | -0.73* | 0.84** | ||
缬氨酸 | -0.74* | -0.86** | -0.70* | 0.92** | -0.63 | -0.93** | 0.85** | -0.70* | -0.55 | -0.83** | 0.88** | ||
蛋氨酸 | 0.18 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.36 | 0.23 | -0.15 | 0.05 | ||
异亮氨酸 | -0.52 | -0.67* | -0.61 | 0.76* | -0.58 | -0.79* | 0.68* | -0.54 | -0.49 | -0.66 | 0.72* | ||
亮氨酸 | -0.76* | -0.88** | -0.72* | 0.93** | -0.64 | -0.94** | 0.86** | -0.72* | -0.57 | -0.85** | 0.89** | ||
笨丙氨酸 | -0.71* | -0.84** | -0.70* | 0.90** | -0.63 | -0.92** | 0.83** | -0.69* | -0.55 | -0.81** | 0.86** | ||
赖氨酸 | -0.50 | -0.63 | -0.72* | 0.71* | -0.57 | -0.76* | 0.63 | -0.54 | -0.50 | -0.61 | 0.73* |
Table 5
Correlation coefficients between fatty acid content of rice at each transplanting stage and meteorological factors during the same period, 2018-2019"
脂肪酸 | 移栽—成熟期 | 移栽—孕穗期 | ||||||||||
T | Tmax | ΔT | ∑T≥10 ℃ | P | T | Tmax | ΔT | |||||
葵酸 | -0.86** | -0.92** | -0.81** | 0.29 | 0.94** | -0.38 | -0.60 | -0.49 | ||||
月桂酸 | -0.84** | -0.92** | -0.78* | 0.20 | 0.93** | -0.28 | -0.51 | -0.55 | ||||
肉豆蔻酸 | -0.82** | -0.83** | -0.74* | 0.42 | 0.87** | -0.47 | -0.62 | -0.27 | ||||
十五碳酸 | -0.86** | -0.93** | -0.75* | 0.22 | 0.95** | -0.31 | -0.55 | -0.56 | ||||
棕榈酸 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.37 | 0.55 | -0.22 | -0.30 | -0.08 | 0.78* | ||||
棕榈油酸 | -0.81** | -0.89** | -0.72* | 0.29 | 0.92** | -0.34 | -0.54 | -0.44 | ||||
十七碳酸 | -0.88** | -0.94** | -0.68* | 0.36 | 0.97** | -0.45 | -0.66 | -0.45 | ||||
十七碳一烯酸 | -0.77* | -0.86** | -0.73* | 0.20 | 0.88** | -0.25 | -0.45 | -0.49 | ||||
硬脂酸 | -0.87** | -0.88** | -0.57 | 0.61 | 0.95** | -0.69* | -0.84** | -0.22 | ||||
油酸 | -0.66 | -0.71* | -0.42 | 0.69* | 0.80** | -0.66 | -0.73* | 0.02 | ||||
亚油酸 | -0.75* | -0.83** | -0.67* | 0.38 | 0.87** | -0.39 | -0.55 | -0.31 | ||||
花生酸 | -0.93** | -0.98** | -0.71* | 0.35 | 0.99** | -0.48 | -0.70* | -0.49 | ||||
二十碳一烯酸 | -0.69* | -0.70* | -0.34 | 0.70* | 0.80** | -0.68* | -0.75* | 0.04 | ||||
二十碳二烯酸 | -0.74* | -0.83** | -0.55 | 0.53 | 0.89** | -0.54 | -0.68* | -0.23 | ||||
二十碳三烯酸 | -0.74* | -0.83** | -0.65 | 0.31 | 0.89** | -0.34 | -0.53 | -0.42 | ||||
二十碳三烯酸 | -0.85** | -0.83** | -0.42 | 0.69* | 0.91** | -0.77* | -0.89** | -0.11 | ||||
二十一碳酸 | -0.84** | -0.90** | -0.55 | 0.47 | 0.96** | -0.54 | -0.73* | -0.36 | ||||
二十二碳酸 | -0.87** | -0.88** | -0.48 | 0.59 | 0.94** | -0.69* | -0.85** | -0.25 | ||||
芥酸 | -0.69* | -0.63 | -0.33 | 0.68* | 0.74* | -0.76* | -0.83** | -0.01 | ||||
二十三碳酸 | -0.82** | -0.85** | -0.44 | 0.58 | 0.93** | -0.66 | -0.81** | -0.25 | ||||
二十四碳酸 | -0.85** | -0.86** | -0.46 | 0.60 | 0.94** | -0.70* | -0.85** | -0.24 | ||||
二十四碳一烯酸 | -0.80** | -0.87** | -0.60 | 0.25 | 0.91** | -0.32 | -0.53 | -0.49 | ||||
脂肪酸 | 抽穗—乳熟期 | 孕穗—成熟期 | ||||||||||
T | Tmax | Tmin | ΔT | P | S | T | Tmin | ΔT | ∑T≥10 ℃ | P | ||
葵酸 | -0.29 | -0.58 | 0.43 | -0.92** | 0.89** | -0.75* | -0.13 | 0.29 | -0.91** | 0.56 | 0.96** | |
月桂酸 | -0.32 | -0.62 | 0.42 | -0.95** | 0.88** | -0.81** | -0.24 | 0.20 | -0.88** | 0.52 | 0.96** | |
肉豆蔻酸 | -0.11 | -0.39 | 0.52 | -0.79* | 0.83** | -0.62 | 0.05 | 0.44 | -0.90** | 0.69* | 0.93** | |
十五碳酸 | -0.30 | -0.61 | 0.44 | -0.95** | 0.91** | -0.82** | -0.21 | 0.22 | -0.89** | 0.53 | 0.96** | |
棕榈酸 | 0.73* | 0.72* | 0.44 | 0.42 | -0.21 | 0.66 | 0.68* | 0.57 | -0.03 | 0.51 | -0.03 | |
棕榈油酸 | -0.20 | -0.51 | 0.51 | -0.90** | 0.88** | -0.73* | -0.14 | 0.29 | -0.90** | 0.62 | 0.97** | |
十七碳酸 | -0.18 | -0.51 | 0.56 | -0.93** | 0.95** | -0.75* | -0.08 | 0.36 | -0.94** | 0.63 | 0.98** | |
十七碳一烯酸 | -0.26 | -0.55 | 0.44 | -0.90** | 0.83** | -0.75* | -0.22 | 0.20 | -0.85** | 0.55 | 0.95** | |
硬脂酸 | 0.06 | -0.28 | 0.71* | -0.79* | 0.95** | -0.55 | 0.23 | 0.61 | -0.96** | 0.77* | 0.94** | |
油酸 | 0.27 | -0.06 | 0.79* | -0.63 | 0.79* | -0.32 | 0.35 | 0.69* | -0.92** | 0.88** | 0.89** | |
亚油酸 | -0.10 | -0.40 | 0.56 | -0.83** | 0.83** | -0.62 | -0.03 | 0.38 | -0.90** | 0.68* | 0.96** | |
花生酸 | -0.22 | -0.55 | 0.53 | -0.95** | 0.97** | -0.79* | -0.09 | 0.34 | -0.94** | 0.59 | 0.97** | |
二十碳一烯酸 | 0.32 | -0.01 | 0.84** | -0.61 | 0.82** | -0.33 | 0.38 | 0.71* | -0.89** | 0.90** | 0.88** | |
二十碳二烯酸 | 0.07 | -0.28 | 0.71* | -0.80** | 0.87** | -0.51 | 0.12 | 0.52 | -0.95** | 0.77* | 0.97** | |
二十碳三烯酸 | -0.14 | -0.45 | 0.53 | -0.86** | 0.85** | -0.64 | -0.07 | 0.32 | -0.86** | 0.61 | 0.94** | |
二十碳三烯酸 | 0.18 | -0.16 | 0.79* | -0.71* | 0.94** | -0.48 | 0.35 | 0.70* | -0.93** | 0.81** | 0.88** | |
二十一碳酸 | -0.04 | -0.39 | 0.66 | -0.87** | 0.95** | -0.64 | 0.07 | 0.47 | -0.94** | 0.68* | 0.95** | |
二十二碳酸 | 0.08 | -0.27 | 0.73* | -0.79* | 0.96** | -0.57 | 0.23 | 0.60 | -0.94** | 0.74* | 0.91** | |
芥酸 | 0.23 | -0.04 | 0.67* | -0.51 | 0.78* | -0.29 | 0.48 | 0.71* | -0.75* | 0.69* | 0.67* | |
二十三碳酸 | 0.09 | -0.26 | 0.74* | -0.79* | 0.95** | -0.54 | 0.22 | 0.59 | -0.92** | 0.73* | 0.91** | |
二十四碳酸 | 0.09 | -0.25 | 0.73* | -0.78* | 0.96** | -0.54 | 0.25 | 0.61 | -0.93** | 0.74* | 0.90** | |
二十四碳一烯酸 | -0.20 | -0.51 | 0.51 | -0.90** | 0.89** | -0.75* | -0.16 | 0.25 | -0.85** | 0.55 | 0.93** |
Table 6
Correlation coefficients of protein, fat, starch, and amylose contents with meteorological factors for the same period at each transplanting stage of rice, 2018-2019"
营养成分 | 移栽—成熟期 | 移栽—孕穗期 | ||||||||
T/℃ | Tmax/℃ | ΔT/℃ | P/mm | Tmax/℃ | ΔT/℃ | |||||
蛋白质/(g/100 g) | -0.34 | -0.32 | -0.43 | 0.34 | 0.02 | -0.59 | ||||
脂肪/(g/100 g) | -0.91** | -0.96** | -0.77* | 0.96** | -0.72* | -0.49 | ||||
淀粉/(g/100 g) | 0.73* | 0.74* | 0.82** | -0.68* | 0.18 | 0.82** | ||||
直链淀粉/(%) | -0.81** | -0.81** | -0.88** | 0.75* | -0.40 | -0.60 | ||||
营养成分 | 抽穗—乳熟期 | 孕穗—成熟期 | ||||||||
T/℃ | Tmax/℃ | ΔT/℃ | ∑T≥10 ℃ | P/mm | S/h | Tmax/℃ | ΔT/℃ | P/mm | ||
蛋白质/(g/100g) | -0.58 | -0.59 | -0.43 | -0.52 | 0.30 | -0.54 | -0.45 | -0.12 | 0.19 | |
脂肪/(g/100g) | -0.27 | -0.57 | -0.91** | -0.16 | 0.92** | -0.75* | -0.48 | -0.93** | 0.92** | |
淀粉/(g/100g) | 0.73* | 0.86** | 0.81** | 0.76* | -0.63 | 0.94** | 0.78* | 0.48 | -0.60 | |
直链淀粉/(%) | -0.45 | -0.65 | -0.79* | -0.54 | 0.73* | -0.82** | -0.59 | -0.65 | 0.75* |
1 |
Peng S B , Tang Q Y , Zou Y B . Current status and challenges of rice production in China[J]. Plant Production Science, 2009, 12 (1): 3- 8.
doi: 10.1626/pps.12.3 |
2 | 王岩, 高美琦, 卞景阳, 等. 盘锦地区不同品种水稻品质及其冠层高光谱反射率特征分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2024, 40 (2): 77- 85. |
3 | 杨建昌, 李超卿, 江贻. 稻米氨基酸含量和组分及其调控[J]. 作物学报, 2022, 48 (5): 1037- 1050. |
4 | 徐玉秀, 蒋姗姗, 周福然, 等. 1981—2010年锦州地区玉米生育期气象因子变化及其与气象产量的关系[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2017, 33 (5): 82- 90. |
5 | 赵先丽, 李丽光, 蔡福, 等. 播期对辽南地区春玉米生育进程及产量影响的试验研究[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2017, 33 (6): 66- 72. |
6 | 徐英, 李曼华, 李辉, 等. 不同发育期的干旱对华北地区夏玉米生长发育及产量的影响[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2017, 33 (1): 108- 112. |
7 | 邱美娟, 郭巧, 郭春明, 等. 吉林省春玉米农业气候资源适宜度时空分布特征[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2018, 34 (2): 82- 91. |
8 | 吕世华, 任光俊, 曾祥忠, 等. 不同移栽期对强化栽培优质杂交水稻生长及产量的影响研究[J]. 中国生态农业学报, 2004, 12 (2): 138- 139. |
9 | 李秀芬, 贾燕, 黄元才, 等. 播栽期对水稻产量和产量构成因素及生育期的影响[J]. 生态学杂志, 2004, 23 (5): 98- 100. |
10 | 许轲, 孙圳, 霍中洋, 等. 播期、品种类型对水稻产量、生育期及温光利用的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46 (20): 4222- 4233. |
11 | 舒素芳, 胡谷琅, 房玉伟, 等. 播期对机插晚稻甬优2640生长特性的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2014, 35 (6): 644- 649. |
12 | 汪伟, 裘实, 朱大伟, 等. 播种期对不同软米粳稻品种产量生育期及温光资源利用的影响[J]. 中国稻米, 2018, 24 (2): 79- 83. |
13 | 邱译萱, 马树庆, 高峰, 等. 吉林省东部粳稻生长和产量对移栽期和温度变化的反应[J]. 生态学杂志, 2016, 35 (4): 909- 916. |
14 | 柳丹. 不同移栽期对水稻新品种松辽186产量构成因素影响试验研究[J]. 北方水稻, 2019, 49 (5): 23- 25. |
15 | 吕文俊, 王志玺, 张欣, 等. 移栽期对优质稻米产量及食味的影响[J]. 天津农学院学报, 2018, 25 (3): 1- 8. |
16 | 张国发, 王绍华, 尤娟, 等. 结实期不同时段高温对稻米品质的影响[J]. 作物学报, 2006, 32 (2): 283- 287. |
17 | 曹云英. 高温对水稻产量与品质的影响及其生理机制[D]. 扬州: 扬州大学, 2009: 57-65. |
18 | 马启林, 李阳生, 田小海, 等. 高温胁迫对水稻贮藏蛋白质的组成和积累形态的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42 (2): 714- 718. |
19 | 张桂莲, 张顺堂, 王力, 等. 抽穗结实期不同时段高温对稻米品质的影响[J]. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46 (14): 2869- 2879. |
20 | Xiong D L , Ling X X , Huang J L , et al. Meta-analysis and dose-response analysis of high temperature effects on rice yield and quality[J]. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 2017, 141, 1- 9. |
21 | 谢晓金, 李秉柏, 李映雪, 等. 抽穗期高温胁迫对水稻产量构成要素和品质的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2010, 31 (3): 411- 415. |
22 | Lin C J , Li C Y , Lin S K , et al. Influence of high temperature during grain filling on the accumulation of storage proteins and grain quality in rice (Oryza sativa L.)[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2010, 58 (19): 10545- 10552. |
23 | 王云霞, 杨连新. 水稻品质对主要气候变化因子的响应[J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2020, 39 (4): 822- 833. |
24 | 陆佳岚, 马成, 陶明煊, 等. 不同光温条件对水稻9311产量及品质的影响[J]. 江苏农业学报, 2020, 36 (3): 535- 543. |
25 | Matsue Y , Mizuta K , Furuno K , et al. Studies on palatability of rice grown in northern Kyushu: I.Effects of transplanting time and lodging time on palatability and physicochemical properties of milled rice[J]. Japanese Journal of Crop Science, 1991, 60 (4): 490- 496. |
26 | Xu Y J , Jian C Q , Li K , et al. The role of polyamines in regulating amino acid biosynthesis in rice grains[J]. Food and Energy Security, 2021, 10 (4): e306. |
27 | 曹珍珍, 张其芳, 韦克苏, 等. 水稻籽粒氮代谢几个关键酶对花后高温胁迫的响应及其与贮藏蛋白积累关系[J]. 作物学报, 2012, 38 (1): 99- 106. |
28 | 梁成刚, 张青, 李敬, 等. 水稻灌浆期高温对天冬氨酸代谢酶活性及其家族氨基酸含量的影响[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27 (1): 71- 76. |
29 | 彭国照, 柏建, 王景波. 安宁河流域稻米蛋白质、氨基酸含量与气象条件的关系[J]. 中国农业气象, 2004, 25 (3): 45- 48. |
30 | Huang M , Zhang H D , Zhao C R , et al. Amino acid content in rice grains is affected by high temperature during the early grain-filling period[J]. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9, 2700. |
31 | 许光利, 刘佳, 梁成刚, 等. 灌浆结实期弱光对水稻籽粒氮代谢酶及蛋白质含量的影响[J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42 (1): 53- 62. |
32 | Jing L Q , Dombinov V , Shen S B , et al. Physiological and genotype-specific factors associated with grain quality changes in rice exposed to high ozone[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2016, 210, 397- 408. |
33 | 吕晓, 张兵兵, 杨璐, 等. 水稻拔节期和抽穗期低温对稻米品质影响[J]. 广东农业科学, 2020, 47 (2): 1- 8. |
34 | 程方民, 钟连进. 不同气候生态条件下稻米品质性状的变异及主要影响因子分析[J]. 中国水稻科学, 2001, 15 (3): 187- 191. |
35 | 唐启义. DPS数据处理系统——实验设计统计分析及数据挖掘(2版)[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010: 76-80, 220-222, 654-655. |
36 | 金正勋, 秋太权, 孙艳丽, 等. 结实期温度对稻米理化特性及淀粉谱特性的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2001, 22 (2): 1-5, 11. |
37 | Gu J F , Li Z K , Mao Y Q , et al. Roles of nitrogen and cytokinin signals in root and shoot communications in maximizing of plant productivity and their agronomic applications[J]. Plant Science, 2018, 274, 320- 331. |
38 | Zhang W Y , Sheng J Y , Xu Y J , et al. Role of brassinosteroids in rice spikelet differentiation and degeneration under soil-drying during panicle development[J]. BMC Plant Biology, 2019, 19, 409. |
39 | 卢善发. 植物脂肪酸的生物合成与基因工程[J]. 植物学通报, 2000, 17 (6): 481- 491. |
[1] | Sijia XUE,Pengpeng WANG,Ruijiang WEI,Yunxiu WANG,Mei YANG,Yuanyuan LIU. Comparative analysis of potato yield forecasting for different methods in Hebei province [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2024, 40(4): 123-130. |
[2] | Mingyu LI, Guohui LI, Yirui ZHANG, Nina CHEN, Na MI, Xin QIN, Chenglong LI. Simulation of optimal irrigation and nitrogen management for spring maize in Northeast China [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2023, 39(4): 122-129. |
[3] | Kai-qi CHEN,Jian-ping LI,Tie-jun XIE,Ya-zhou ZHANG. Effect of Pacific SST tripole on climatic yield of spring maize in northeast China [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2022, 38(5): 72-80. |
[4] | Xiu-fen LI,Shu-qing MA,Hai YU,Li-ping XU,Feng-tao CHEN,Li-juan GONG. Impact of soil water stress from pod filling to maturity on seed setting and yield of spring soybean [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2021, 37(5): 86-92. |
[5] | Ni-na CHEN,Rui-peng JI,Na MI,Shu-jie ZHANG,Wen-ying YU,Yuan FANG,Yu-shu ZHANG. Responses of growth, yield, and grain quality to reduced nitrogen application of spring maize [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2021, 37(4): 86-92. |
[6] | Ping YAN,Sheng-tai JI,Yan-kun SUN,Li-xia JIANG,Qiu-jing WANG,Jia-jia LV,Ping WANG. Change characteristics of farmland soil moisture in Fuyu County and their effects on development period and yield of Maize [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2020, 36(4): 74-82. |
[7] | Ji-bo ZHANG,Xiao-ping XUE,Nan LI,Hong-yi LI,Meng-yuan JIANG. Effects of continuous shading stress on flower-fruit, yield and fruit quality of greenhouse tomato [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2020, 36(2): 85-91. |
[8] | WANG Ping, YAN Ping, LI Xiu-fen, WANG Liang-liang, WANG Qiu-jing, GONG Li-juan. Effects of soil moisture on yield components of soybean in black soil area [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2019, 35(5): 115-122. |
[9] | MA Yong-zhong, CAI Fu, ZHAO Xian-li, WANG Yang. Responses of main physiological parameters and yield of spring maize to drought stress after flowering [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2019, 35(2): 102-106. |
[10] | MI Na, CAI Fu, ZHANG Yu-shu, ZHAO Yi-jun, ZHANG Shu-jie, JI Rui-peng, WANG Yang, WANG He-ran, SUI Ming. Advanced in research on rainfed crop yield gaps [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2018, 34(6): 140-147. |
[11] | ZHU Hai-xia, LI Dong-ming, WANG Ming, WANG Ping, YAN Ping, LI Xiu-fen. Research on crop yield dynamic forecast based on Integration Regression Method in Heilongjiang province [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2018, 34(3): 86-92. |
[12] | XU Yu-xiu, JIANG Shan-shan, ZHOU Fu-ran, WEN Zhou, BAI Xue, SHI Hong-ting, HU Ming, ZHANG Cui-yan. Change trends of meteorological factors during the maize growth period and their relationships with meteorological yield in Jinzhou during 1981-2010 [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2017, 33(5): 82-90. |
[13] | LIU Chun-tao, MU Chen-ying, LI De-ping, GUO Can, ZHU Jun-han. Study on forecast method of Cherry yield in Laoshan District of Qingdao [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2017, 33(5): 108-112. |
[14] | ZHANG Hui, SHI Kui-qiao, CHANG Song, YANG Yang, LI Shuang, JIA Ning, ZHAO Jia. Assessments of biomass and yield of spring maize in the west of Liaoning province base on actual evapotranspiration [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2017, 33(3): 88-94. |
[15] | XU Ying, LI Man-hua, LI Hui, JIANG Peng. Effects of drought on the growth and yield of maize at different stages over the North China plain [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2017, 33(1): 108-112. |
Viewed | ||||||
Full text |
|
|||||
Abstract |
|
|||||