基于降水目标的主雨带识别及预报误差空间检验

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2020.01.005

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用2014—2018年4—6月福建省及周边地区实测降水量和ECMWF模式降水量预报产品资料，采用目标识别方法，设定降水量阈值α，选取合适的特征尺度D₀和邻近度阈值β，分别识别实况降水场的主雨带和预报降水场的所有雨带，并选取匹配度阈值进行目标配对，确定与实况降水场主雨带最匹配的预报降水场主雨带。改进SAL空间检验方法，将模式主雨带预报误差用主雨带的强度（指降水极值和降水量阈值）、位置（指重心点位置）、形态（指主轴、次轴特征长度和轴向角度）属性的预报误差来表示。结果表明：预报主雨带的降水极值比实况小，但降水量阈值比实况大；预报主雨带的重心点位置与实况相比，4月偏西、偏南，5月、6月偏西、偏北，预报主雨带的重心位置多是滞后于实况，位于实况主雨带的上游；主雨带大都呈窄长带状分布，预报主雨带比实况更窄长，且预报时效越长越窄长。预报主雨带轴向角度比实况略小，总体均呈东偏北走向。以上分析结果可为模式主雨带预报误差的订正提供依据。

关键词: 雨带属性, 目标识别, 邻近度阈值

Abstract:

Based on precipitation data from observations and predictions from the ECMWF (European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts) model in Fujian and surrounding areas from April to June in 2014-2018, the main rain belts from the observations and all of the rain belts from predictions were determined using an object identification method, in which a rainfall threshold, an appropriate characteristic spatial scale, and a close degree were set.Through pairing objects with the observations, the threshold of matching degree was selected to determine the predicted main rain belts.The SAL (Structure, Amplitude, and Location) spatial verification method was improved and accounted for the biases associated with the intensity, position, and morphology of the predicting main rain belts.The results show that, compared with the observations, the maximum amount in precipitation for the main rain belts prediction by the model is smaller, but the threshold one is larger.The position of main rain belts lies more westward and southward in April, but more westward and northward in May and June.The position of the main rain belts predictions by the model lags behind the observations and tends to be located in the upstream of the moving direction of the observations.The main rain belts have a stripe shape.The morphology of the predicted main rain belts is narrower and longer, and this tendency intensifies with the forecast lead time.The predicted axial angle of main rain belts is slightly smaller and tends to oriented north-eastwards.This work provides guidance for the bias correction of the main rain belts forecasting by the model.

Key words: Rain belt property, Object identification, Adjacent degree threshold

中图分类号:

P457.6

蔡义勇, 危国飞, 党皓飞, 林青. 基于降水目标的主雨带识别及预报误差空间检验[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2020, 36(1): 36-42.

Yi-yong CAI, Guo-fei WEI, Hao-fei DANG, Qing LIN. Identification and spatial verification of the forecasting bias of the main rain belts based on precipitation objectives[J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2020, 36(1): 36-42.

图/表 7

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

参考文献 21

1	毕宝贵, 代刊, 王毅, 等. 定量降水预报技术进展[J]. 应用气象学报, 2016, 27 (5): 534- 549.
2	宗志平, 代刊, 蒋星. 定量降水预报技术研究进展[J]. 气象科技进展, 2012, 2 (5): 29- 35.
3	Davis C , Brown B , Bullock R . Object-based verification of precipitation forecasts.Part Ⅰ:Methodology and application to mesoscale rain areas[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2006, 134 (7): 1772- 1784. doi: 10.1175/MWR3145.1
4	Marzban C , Sandgathe S . Cluster analysis for verification of precipitation fields[J]. Weather and Forecasting, 2006, 21 (5): 824- 838. doi: 10.1175/WAF948.1
5	刘凑华, 牛若芸. 基于目标的降水检验方法及应用[J]. 气象, 2013, 39 (6): 681- 690.
6	Ebert E E . Neighborhood verification:a strategy for rewarding close forecasts[J]. Weather and Forecasting, 2009, 24 (6): 1498- 1510. doi: 10.1175/2009WAF2222251.1
7	赵滨, 张博. 邻域空间检验方法在降水评估中的应用[J]. 暴雨灾害, 2018, 37 (1): 1- 7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9045.2018.01.001
8	Casati B , Ross G , Stephenson D B . A new intensity-scale approach for the verification of spatial precipitation forecasts[J]. Meteorological Applications, 2004, 11 (2): 141- 154.
9	孔荣, 王建捷, 梁丰, 等. 尺度分解技术在定量降水临近预报检验中的应用[J]. 应用气象学报, 2010, 21 (5): 535- 544. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7313.2010.05.003
10	符娇兰, 代刊. 基于CRA空间检验技术的西南地区东部强降水EC模式预报误差分析[J]. 气象, 2016, 42 (12): 1456- 1464. doi: 10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2016.12.003
11	符娇兰, 宗志平, 代刊, 等. 一种定量降水预报误差检验技术及其应用[J]. 气象, 2014, 40 (7): 796- 805.
12	尤凤春, 王国荣, 郭锐, 等. MODE方法在降水预报检验中的应用分析[J]. 气象, 2011, 37 (12): 1498- 1503. doi: 10.7519/j.issn.1000-0526.2011.12.004
13	王国荣, 陈敏, 由凤春, 等. 基于对象诊断的空间检验方法(MODE)[J]. 气象科技, 2014, 42 (4): 652- 656. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-6345.2014.04.022
14	李佳, 陈葆德, 徐同. 目标检验方法在高分辨率数值天气预报检验中的应用[J]. 沙漠与绿洲气象, 2016, 10 (5): 1- 9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0799.2016.05.001
15	Wernli H , Paulat M , Hagen M , et al. SAL-a novel quality measure for the verification of quantitative precipitation forecasts[J]. Monthly Weather Review, 2008, 136 (11): 4470- 4487. doi: 10.1175/2008MWR2415.1
16	公颖. SAL定量降水预报检验方法的解释与应用[J]. 暴雨灾害, 2010, 29 (2): 153- 159. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9045.2010.02.009
17	李明, 袁凯, 翟红楠. 一种面向对象的强降水精细化预报质量检验方法及应用[J]. 暴雨灾害, 2017, 36 (1): 81- 85. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9045.2017.01.011
18	徐姝, 尉英华, 熊明明, 等. 频率匹配法在海河流域ECMWF集合预报融合产品中的应用研究[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2018, 34 (4): 11- 17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2018.04.002
19	张宏芳, 潘留杰, 杨新. ECMWF、日本高分辨率模式降水预报能力的对比分析[J]. 气象, 2014, 40 (4): 424- 432. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-1742.2014.04.016
20	翟振芳, 魏春璇, 邓斌, 等. 安徽省ECMWF数值模式降水预报性能的检验[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2017, 33 (5): 1- 9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2017.05.001
21	孙素琴, 郑婧, 金米娜, 等. 基于多模式2015年江西省汛期区域性暴雨的检验[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2017, 33 (2): 1- 7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2017.02.001

[1]	王秀英, 廖留峰, 王俊杰. 基于多元线性回归的滇西南短时强降水预报模型研究[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2019, 35(2): 15-22.
[2]	纪永明, 陈传雷, 蒋大凯, 任志杰, 孟莹, 才奎志, 张硕, 胡鹏宇. 基于雷达组网拼图的定量降水反演II:方案改进及综合评估[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2019, 35(1): 79-87.
[3]	张丽, 徐朋飞, 吴胜平, 董方有. 安庆市降水相态识别判据研究[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2018, 34(1): 30-37.
[4]	储海, 漆梁波. 基于模式相对湿度的降水概率预报方法研究[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2017, 33(1): 44-50.
[5]	李崇, 吉曹翔, 夏传栋, 张治, 李典, 孟鹏, 班伟龙, 梁红. 沈阳地区强对流天气潜势预报环境参数特征分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2016, 32(6): 43-51.
[6]	朱占云, 陈光宇, 姜瑜君, 沈萍月, 许娈. 浙江省六大水库流域面雨量模式预报效果检验[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2016, 32(3): 28-33.