丽水山地夏季避暑旅游气候适宜度评价

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2021.06.014

Abstract

Abstract:

This study provided the classifications of the climate suitability of summer tourism in Lishui.The procedures include three parts, i.e.the temporal and spatial distribution of climate suitability for summer tourism was analyzed based on the industry standard of evaluation method of climate suitability for summer tourism designed by the China Meteorological Administration and the daily and hourly data from 283 meteorological observation stations in Lishui during 2015 to 2019;using GIS platform established a geographic estimation model for climate suitability for summer tourism under different terrain conditions; the climatic suitability of summer tourism in Lishui was divided using this geographic estimation model.The results show that the climate suitability grade for summer tourism in Lishui is very suitable, accounting for absolute proportion in the area.In June, the suitability of stations in Lishui is very suitable.At the altitude of 800 m, the suitability first increases and then decreases as the altitude increases.In July and August, the climate suitability for summer tourism increases with the increase in altitude.The stations above 300 m are in more suitable grade or above.The result from geographic estimation model shows that the climate suitability for summer tourism in Lishui is closely related to altitude.The proportion of areas with suitable grade and above in Qingyuan is the highest where the weather conditions for summer tourism are particularly excellent.Jingning, Suichang, and Longquan are followed in turn.

Key words: Summer tourism, Climate suitability, Mountain

CLC Number:

P463.1

Hao-min WU, Yan-min JIANG, Bo SI, Yun-xia BAI. Evaluation of climate suitability for summer tourism in mountain land of Lishui[J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2021, 37(6): 106-112.

Figures/Tables 8

Fig.1

Table 1

Table 2

Fig.2

Fig.3

Fig.4

Table 3

Table 4

References 17

1	贺志明, 邓诗茹, 吴琼, 等. 1963—2012年南昌市气温和降水变化分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2018, 34 (2): 35- 43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2018.02.005
2	孙仕强, 鹿文涵, 郭建民, 等. 2012—2016年宁波市中暑流行特征及热浪对其影响分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2019, 35 (1): 66- 71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2019.01.009
3	纪玲玲, 袭祝香, 陈卓, 等. 吉林省高温天气气候特征及其过程等级评估[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2020, 36 (3): 49- 54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2020.03.007
4	郑薇薇, 孟茹. 汉中市避暑旅游气象条件分析[J]. 陕西气象, 2015, (4): 36- 38. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-4354.2015.04.010
5	温丽华, 叶丽文, 钟瑜珊, 等. 新丰避暑旅游气候舒适度对比分析[J]. 农村科学实验, 2019, (29): 45- 48.
6	侯亚红, 息涛, 徐方妹, 等. 辽宁避暑旅游气侯条件分析和气象指数研究[J]. 气象与环境科学, 2018, 4l (4): 34- 40.
7	孙银川, 王素艳, 李浩, 等. 宁夏六盘山区夏季避暑旅游气候舒适度分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2018, 36 (6): 1035- 1042.
8	杨雪艳, 傅帅, 徐士琦, 等. 吉林省消夏旅游期气候条件及舒适度分析[J]. 干旱气象, 2018, 36 (3): 492- 500, 506.
9	吴普, 葛全胜, 齐晓波, 等. 气候因素对滨海旅游目的地旅游需求的影响—以海南岛为例[J]. 资源科学, 2010, 32 (1): 157- 162.
10	张波, 谭文, 古书鸿, 等. 1961—2015年贵州省夏季旅游气候舒适度评价[J]. 干旱气象, 2017, 35 (3): 420- 426, 438.
11	李正泉, 肖晶晶, 马浩, 等. 丽水市生态气候休闲养生适宜性分析[J]. 气象与环境科学, 2016, 39 (3): 104- 111.
12	马乃孚, 宋正满, 杜荣. 神农架避暑疗养旅游综合气候区划探讨[J]. 华中师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 1997, (4): 104- 109.
13	王宝钧, 宋翠娥. 张家口市气候资源避暑效应评价—兼与承德市、秦皇岛市的比较研究[J]. 首都师范大学学报: 自然科学版, 2006, 27 (5): 75- 79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-9398.2006.05.015
14	杨舒琳, 林中鹏, 韩赓. 泉州市盛夏避暑旅游气候资源及区划分析[J]. 农业灾害研究, 2015, (12): 27- 29, 56.
15	杨俊, 张永恒, 席建超. 中国避暑旅游基地适宜性综合评价研究[J]. 资源科学, 2016, 38 (12): 2210- 2220.
16	中国气象局. 避暑旅游气候适宜度评价方法(QX/T 500— 2019)[S]. 北京: 气象出版社, 2019.
17	唐从国, 刘丛强. 基于SRTM DEM数据的清水江流域地表水文模拟[J]. 辽宁工程技术大学学报: 自然科学版, 2009, 28 (4): 652- 655. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0562.2009.04.037

级别	级别名称	划分标准	等级说明
1级	很适宜	L≥20	气候条件很适宜避暑旅游
2级	适宜	15≤L＜20	气候条件适宜避暑旅游
3级	较适宜	5≤L＜15	气候条件较适宜避暑旅游
4级	不适宜	L＜5	气候条件不适宜避暑旅游

L值统计	6月	7月	8月	夏季平均
L-平均	40.7	14.4	13.9	24.1
L一级(很适宜)频率/(%)	81.3	37.6	35.9	51.6
L二级(适宜)频率/(%)	3.7	6.4	4.9	5.0
L三级(较适宜)频率/(%)	8.8	13.1	14.1	12.0
L四级(不适宜)频率/(%)	6.1	42.8	45.1	31.3

县市(区)	L < 5	5≤L < 15	15≤L < 20	20≤L≤50	L>50
缙云	0.71	3.07	1.34	7.38	2.44
龙泉	0.00	2.00	1.92	15.06	11.45
庆元	0.00	0.09	0.38	7.18	11.32
景宁	0.40	0.97	0.74	9.42	7.86
云和	0.68	1.56	0.78	4.47	2.41
青田	3.72	3.26	1.93	12.99	2.88
遂昌	0.00	1.43	1.40	12.94	9.63
松阳	1.74	1.62	0.79	6.95	2.91
莲都	3.87	2.55	1.22	5.88	1.41

县市(区)	L < 5	5≤L < 15	15≤L < 20	20≤L≤50	L>50
缙云	4.77	20.55	9.01	49.37	16.30
龙泉	0.00	6.59	6.32	49.48	37.61
庆元	0.00	0.48	2.00	37.84	59.68
景宁	2.04	5.01	3.83	48.60	40.52
云和	6.85	15.78	7.87	45.18	24.32
青田	15.02	13.17	7.78	52.43	11.60
遂昌	0.00	5.61	5.51	50.96	37.92
松阳	12.39	11.54	5.67	49.59	20.81
莲都	25.92	17.05	8.20	39.36	9.47

[1]	Xue-bin QU,Yan-ping WANG,Shu-xiang YANG,Hai-qing SONG,Yue-ji ZHAO,Xiao-hua ZOU. Spatio-temporal distribution characteristics of dry lightning in the Greater Khingan Mountains of Inner Mongolia from 2014 to 2018 [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2021, 37(1): 53-58.
[2]	Xin QIN,Jin-guang ZHANG,Ze-feng ZHANG,Qing MIAO,Hong-qiang LI,Shu-hui ZHAO,Si-hang QUAN,Jia-li MA. Study on the closure of cloud condensation nuclei based on ion pairing method at Huangshan Mountain [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2021, 37(1): 82-90.
[3]	Xing-jie JI, Xuan ZUO, Wen-hui XU. Interpolation and variation trend analysis of air temperature data at Songshan mountain station in He'nan province [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2020, 36(6): 58-67.
[4]	Li-ping YANG,Cun-hou ZHANG,Hai-yan DAI,Di-bo LV,Jun HAN. Effects of climate change on phenophase of woody plants at the northern foot of Yinshan Mountain [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2020, 36(1): 102-107.
[5]	DU Qi-cheng, HUANG Jun-kai, SHEN Xu-yang, NIU Jun-yi. Climate characteristics of high-temperature and diagnosis of a continuous high-temperature process in Huangshan area [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2019, 35(6): 85-92.
[6]	PENG Jia-dong, YE Cheng-zhi, ZHANG Jian-ming, CHEN De-qiao. Homogeneity test and variation characteristics of wind speed at two typical high mountainous meteorological stations in Central China [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2019, 35(4): 139-144.
[7]	WANG Xin-wei, ZHANG Yu-xing, WEI Fang-fang. Research on forecast method of maximum and minimum air temperature in mountainous scenic spot [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2019, 35(2): 92-96.
[8]	ZHANG Yong, CHEN Lan-ying, LIU Ting, XIAO Juan. Change characteristics and prediction model about concentration of anions in the Emei mountain scenic spot [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2018, 34(2): 61-68.
[9]	QIU Mei-juan, GUO Qiao, GUO Chun-ming, WANG Dong-ni, YUAN Fu-xiang, MU Chen-ying. Temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of spring maize agro-climatic resources suitability in Jilin province [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2018, 34(2): 82-91.
[10]	CHENG Yue-xing, DAI Jian, WANG Wei-qi, LI Yan. Analysis of weather type during period of heavy air pollution days in Chaoyang District,Beijing [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2017, 33(5): 44-52.
[11]	QI Hong-yan, SHEN Hui, WEI Wei, LIU Zhi. Experimental research on the snowfall enhancement through orographic clouds at Xiling Snow Mountain [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2017, 33(4): 93-101.
[12]	HU Yi-xin, LIU Yu-ying, ZHANG Chen-chen, YU Xiu-jing, WEI Xiao-li. Characteristics of heating degree days in the Changbai Mountains [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2016, 32(4): 144-149.
[13]	QIU Mei-juan, SONG Ying-bo, WANG Jian-lin, WANG Dong-ni, QU Si-miao, REN Jing-quan, WU Ding-rong, LIU Jian-dong. Determination of weight coefficient in agro-meteorological yield prediction [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2016, 32(2): 106-111.
[14]	GUO Xiao-chao, XIAO Lei,LI Ming-yuan,YAO Zheng-lan, YAO Cheng-yong. Error analysis of hail index and its application to hail cloud identification [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2014, 30(1): 36-42.
[15]	YU Wen-ying ;ZHOU Guang-sheng, ;ZHAO Xian-li ;XIE Yan-bin ;JIA Qing-yu. Characteristics of forest fire and its controls in Daxing’anling Mountains, Heilongjiang province [J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2009, 25(4): 1-5.

Evaluation of climate suitability for summer tourism in mountain land of Lishui

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Knowledge

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 17

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10