2020年1—3月四川地区大气污染物变化特征分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2022.01.003

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用2018-2020年中国环境监测总站全国城市空气质量实时发布平台公布的监测点数据以及中国气象局气象站点的同期地面观测资料，采用相关性分析的方法对2020年1-3月四川地区大气污染物的变化特征进行分析。结果表明：由于2020年1-3月人为排放源管控政策的实施，成都、绵阳、宜宾和攀枝花的NO₂和PM₁₀浓度相比2018-2019年同期平均下降幅度达到30%，而O₃质量浓度在四座城市的日均值却分别上升了15.21%、10.32%、5.03%和0.42%。同时，O₃与相对湿度成负相关关系，与温度、风速和降水成正相关关系且相关系数都超过了0.7。O₃的反常增长不仅是受到气象要素的影响，较低的氮氧化物和PM₁₀浓度也间接维持了O₃的存在。严格的污染物排放控制措施对主要污染物排放影响较大，但对臭氧等次生污染物的影响较小，次生污染物污染的防治依旧面临严峻挑战。

关键词: 臭氧, 二氧化氮, PM₁₀

Abstract:

Based on the monitoring data published by the China Environmental Monitoring Station and ground observation data of the China Meteorological Administration during 2018-2020, the variation characteristics of air pollutants in Sichuan province from January to March of 2020 were analyzed using the correlation analysis method.The results show that due to the implementation of anthropogenic emission source control policies from January to March of 2020, the concentrations of NO₂ and PM₁₀ in Chengdu, Mianyang, Yibin, and Panzhihua decrease by 30% on average compared with the same period of 2018-2019.However, the daily mean of O₃ mass concentration in the four cities increases by 15.21%, 10.32%, 5.03%, and 0.42%, respectively.At the same time, the correlation analysis of O₃ with relative humidity, temperature, wind speed, and precipitation shows that O₃ is negatively correlated with relative humidity, and positively correlated with temperature, wind speed, and precipitation, with the correlation coefficients exceeding 0.7.The abnormal growth of O₃ is not only affected by meteorological elements but also indirectly maintained by low nitrogen oxide and PM₁₀ concentrations.Strict pollutant emission control measures have a great impact on the emission of major pollutants, but less impact on secondary pollutants such as ozone.The prevention and control of secondary pollutant pollution are still facing severe challenges.

Key words: Ozone, Nitrogen dioxide, PM₁₀

中图分类号:

李伟杰,赵胡笳,陈权亮,安林昌,张婕,王绪鑫. 2020年1—3月四川地区大气污染物变化特征分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2022, 38(1): 15-22.

Wei-jie LI,Hu-jia ZHAO,Quan-liang CHEN,Lin-chang AN,Jie ZHANG,Xu-xin WANG. Variation characteristics of air pollutants in Sichuan region during January-March of 2020[J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2022, 38(1): 15-22.

图/表 6

图1

表1

表2

图2

图3

表3

参考文献 26

1	吴锴, 康平, 王占山, 等. 成都市臭氧污染特征及气象成因研究[J]. 环境科学学报, 2017, 37 (11): 4241- 4252.
2	柯伯俊. 四川省大气污染源排放清单研究[D]. 西南交通大学, 2014.
3	周书华, 倪长健, 刘培川. 成都地区大气边界层逆温特征分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2015, 31 (2): 108- 111.
4	周启星. 气候变化对环境与健康影响研究进展[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2006, 22 (1): 38- 44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2006.01.009
5	刘华悦, 付桂琴, 王洁. 石家庄市气象要素对成人哮喘住院人数的影响[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2019, 35 (5): 137- 143. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2019.05.018
6	Nuvolone D , Petri D , Voller F . The effects of ozone on human health[J]. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2018, 25 (9): 8074- 8088. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9239-3
7	Seinfeld J H , Pandis S N . From air pollution to climate change[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 1998, 1326
8	杨昆, 黄一彦, 石峰, 等. 美日臭氧污染问题及治理经验借鉴研究[J]. 中国环境管理, 2018, 10 (02): 85- 90.
9	Paoletti E , Marco A D , Beddows D C S , et al. Ozone levels in European and USA cities are increasing more than at rural sites, while peak values are decreasing[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2014, 192 (9): 295- 299.
10	Lefohn A S , Malley C S , Smith L , et al. Tropospheric ozone assessment report: global ozone metrics for climate change, human health, and crop/ecosystem research[J]. Elementa(Washington, D.C.), 2018, 1, 1.
11	Lauri Myllyvirta . 蓝天保卫战: 能源行业的下一个挑战在哪里?[J]. 能源, 2020, (Z1): 29- 30.
12	Karl T , Graus M , Striednig M , et al. Urban eddy covariance measurements reveal significant missing NOx emissions in Central Europe[J]. Entific Reports, 2017, 7 (1): 13849- 13893.
13	Monks P S , Archibald A T , Colette A , et al. Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2015, 15, 8889- 8973. doi: 10.5194/acp-15-8889-2015
14	郝吉明, 田贺忠. 中国氮氧化物排放现状、趋势及控制对策建议[C]. //2004全国燃煤二氧化硫、氮氧化物污染治理技术研讨会技术汇编. 中国环境科学学会, 2004: 362-371.
15	Huang K , Zhuang G , Lin Y , et al. Impact of anthropogenic emission on air quality over a megacity-revealed from an intensive atmospheric campaign during the Chinese spring festival[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2012, 12 (23): 11631- 11645. doi: 10.5194/acp-12-11631-2012
16	周子航, 邓也, 谭钦文, 等. 四川省人为源大气污染物排放清单及特征[J]. 环境科学, 2018, 39 (12): 5344- 5358.
17	徐晨曦, 陈军辉, 李媛, 等. 四川省基于第二次污染源普查数据的人为源大气污染源排放清单及特征[J/OL]. 环境科学: 1-18[2020-07-14]. https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202002162.
18	Sicard P , De Marco A , Agathokleous E , et al. Amplified ozone pollution in cities during the COVID-19 lockdown[J]. Science of The Total Environment, 2020, 735, 139542. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139542
19	郑丽英, 许婷婷, 陈志安, 等. 成都市夏季臭氧污染特征及影响因素[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2019, 35 (5): 78- 84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2019.05.010
20	He Z , Wang X , Ling Z , et al. Contributions of different anthropogenic volatile organic compound sources to ozone formation at a receptor site in the Pearl River Delta region and its policy implications[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 2019, 19 (13): 8801- 8816. doi: 10.5194/acp-19-8801-2019
21	Chen Z , Li R , Chen D , et al. Understanding the causal influence of major meteorological factors on ground ozone concentrations across China[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 242, 118498. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118498
22	Solberg S , Bergstroem R , Langner J , et al. Changes in Nordic surface ozone episodes due to European emission reductions in the 1990s[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2005, 39 (1): 179- 192. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.08.049
23	Pierre Sicard , Romain Serra , Philippe Rossello . Spatiotemporal trends in ground-level ozone concentrations and metrics in France over the time period 1999-2012[J]. Environmental Research, 2016, 149 (aug.): 122- 144.
24	Li M , Wang T , Xie M , et al. Impacts of aerosol-radiation feedback on local air quality during a severe haze episode in Nanjing megacity, eastern China[J]. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 2017, 69 (1): 1339548. doi: 10.1080/16000889.2017.1339548
25	Wolff G T , Kahlbaum D F , Heuss J M . The vanishing ozone weekday/weekend effect[J]. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 2013, 63 (3): 292- 299.
26	Li J , Wang Z , Wang X , et al. Impacts of aerosols on summertime tropospheric photolysis frequencies and photochemistry over Central Eastern China[J]. Atmospheric Environment, 2011, 45 (10): 1817- 1829. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2011.01.016

要素	1月	2月	3月
最大值/(μg·m^-3)	68.71	70.34	74.37
平均值/(μg·m^-3)	25.51	47.13	46.99
累积超标天数/d	0	0	0

气象要素	NO₂	O₃	PM₁₀	1月	2月	3月
相对湿度	0.21	-0.71	0.08	4.68%	-4.56%	-4.86%
温度	0.11	0.88	-0.09	15.43%	25.69%	8.33%
风速	-0.25	0.72	-0.48	-6.58%	10.25%	6.18%
降水	0.09	0.66	-0.22	15.61%	12.20%	-28.57%

[1]	王学强,董慧杰. 一次中尺度对流风暴造成的内蒙古局地沙尘天气过程分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2021, 37(6): 11-19.
[2]	符传博, 丹利, 徐文帅, 刘丽君. 2015-2018年海南省臭氧污染特征及其天气类型[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2021, 37(6): 27-35.
[3]	周士茹,宋金妹,陆倩,郭鸿鸣,赵玉广,高艳春. 气象因子和海风对秦皇岛市臭氧污染的影响[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2021, 37(2): 64-70.
[4]	韩余,周国兵,陈道劲,杨春,闵凡花. 重庆市臭氧污染及其气象因子预报方法对比研究[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2020, 36(4): 59-66.
[5]	余钟奇, 马井会, 毛卓成, 曹钰, 瞿元昊, 许建明. 2017年上海臭氧污染气象条件分析及臭氧污染天气分型研究[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2019, 35(6): 46-54.
[6]	陆倩, 王国辉, 付娇, 周士茹. 承德市臭氧污染气象条件预报方法研究[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2019, 35(6): 67-76.
[7]	郑丽英, 许婷婷, 陈志安, 王欢博. 成都市夏季臭氧污染特征及影响因素[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2019, 35(5): 78-84.
[8]	虎彩娇, 李锦伦, 王祖武, 成海容, 柯豪昊, 吴婉烨. 黄石市大气PM₁₀和PM_2.5质量浓度特征研究[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2019, 35(4): 40-46.
[9]	陈培章, 陈道劲. 兰州主城臭氧污染特征及气象因子分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2019, 35(2): 46-54.
[10]	李顺姬;李红;陈妙;曹泽磊;黄宇广;李澍. 气象因素对西安市西南城区大气中臭氧及其前体物的影响[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2018, 34(4): 59-67.
[11]	孙维, 程小泉, 王晖, 刘承晓, 黄潇. 合肥市冬季PM₁₀污染特征及大气环境容量测算研究[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2017, 33(2): 80-86.
[12]	梁碧玲, 张丽, 赖鑫, 魏晓琳. 深圳市臭氧污染特征及其与气象条件的关系[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2017, 33(1): 66-71.
[13]	安娟, 王鹏, 吴振东, 芦晓彤, 卢卓义, 刘春明. 2006-2012年辽阳市PM₁₀时空变化特征[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2016, 32(6): 52-57.
[14]	陈翔翔, 胡磊, 彭王敏子, 刘波. 1960-2014年南昌市霾天气气象要素及主要大气污染物变化特征[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2016, 32(5): 114-121.
[15]	蒋璐璐, 钱燕珍, 杜坤, 顾小丽. 宁波市近地层臭氧浓度变化及预测[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2016, 32(1): 53-59.