黄河流域蒸散发与气温和降水以及风速的相关性分析

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2022.01.007

气象与环境学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 48-56.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-503X.2022.01.007

黄河流域蒸散发与气温和降水以及风速的相关性分析

谷同辉¹(),管晓丹^1,^2,*(),高照逵^1,³,黄小倩¹,郭书扬¹

1. 兰州大学大气科学学院, 半干旱气候变化教育部重点实验室, 甘肃兰州 730000
2. 西部生态安全省部共建协同创新中心, 甘肃兰州 730000
3. 西南大学地理科学学院, 重庆 400715

收稿日期:2021-06-21 出版日期:2022-02-28 发布日期:2022-03-02
通讯作者: 管晓丹 E-mail:guth17@lzu.edu.cn;guanxd@lzu.edu.cn
作者简介:谷同辉, 男, 1999年生, 在读硕士研究生, 主要研究方向为黄河流域蒸散发变化, E-mail: guth17@lzu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(42041004);国家自然科学基金(41722502);国家自然科学基金创新研究群体(41521004);中国科学院战略性先导科技专项资助(XDA2006010301);兰州大学中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目(lzujbky-2019-kb30)

Correlation analysis of evapotranspiration with air temperature, precipitation, and wind speed over the Yellow River Basin

Tong-hui GU¹(),Xiao-dan GUAN^1,^2,*(),Zhao-kui GAO^1,³,Xiao-qian HUANG¹,Shu-yang GUO¹

1. College of Atmospheric Sciences, Lanzhou University, Key Laboratory of Semi-Arid Climate Change, Ministry of Education, Lanzhou 730000, China
2. Collaborative Innovation Center for Western Ecological Safety, Lanzhou 730000, China
3. School of Geographic Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China

Received:2021-06-21 Online:2022-02-28 Published:2022-03-02
Contact: Xiao-dan GUAN E-mail:guth17@lzu.edu.cn;guanxd@lzu.edu.cn

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

黄河流经我国干旱半干旱地区，其流域蒸散发变化对当地的生态安全和经济发展尤其重要。本文利用欧洲中期天气预报中心第五代再分析产品（ERA5）定量分析了1979-2020年黄河流域蒸散发的时空变化特征，并结合气温、降水和风速数据，对黄河流域蒸散发与3种气候因子进行了相关性分析。结果表明：黄河流域蒸散发在1979-2020年呈波动下降趋势，空间分布差异明显，源区附近蒸散发上升，上游的干旱区附近蒸散发基本不变，而中游和下游地区主要呈现下降趋势。1979-2020年黄河流域气温持续上升，降水呈波动下降趋势，风速呈上升趋势。对黄河流域蒸散发与气候因子的相关性分析表明，蒸散发与气候因子的相关性空间差异较为明显，蒸散发与气温、风速呈负相关，与降水呈正相关的区域占流域的较大部分；而在复相关性方面，黄河流域大部分地区蒸散发与气候因子的相关性较强，其中以流域上游的干旱区附近复相关性最强。研究黄河流域不同地区蒸散发与气候因子的相关性可为黄河流域水资源的开发管理和区域气候调节提供科学参考。

关键词: 黄河流域, 蒸散发, 气温, 降水, 风速

Abstract:

The Yellow River flows through the arid and semi-arid areas in China, and the variation of the evapotranspiration over the Yellow River Basin is particularly important for the local ecological security and economic development.Based on the ERA5 reanalysis data, we quantitatively analyzed the spatiotemporal variation of evapotranspiration in the Yellow River Basin from 1979 to 2020.In combination with observational data of temperature, precipitation, and wind speed, we also conducted the correlation analysis between evapotranspiration and three climatic factors.The results showed that the evapotranspiration over the Yellow River Basin has a decreasing trend with fluctuations from 1979 to 2020 and a large difference in its spatial distribution.The evapotranspiration increases near the source region, varies hardly near the arid regions in the upper reaches and decreases in the middle and lower reaches.Air temperature over the Yellow River Basin continues to increase from 1979 to 2020, meanwhile, the precipitation decreases with fluctuations, and wind speed has an increasing trend.The correlation analysis between evapotranspiration and climatic factors over the Yellow River Basin indicates that their correlations have obvious spatial differences.The evapotranspiration is negatively correlated with air temperature and wind speed and is positively correlated with precipitation over most areas in the Yellow River Basin.In terms of the multiple correlations, the correlations between evapotranspiration and climatic factors are strong in most areas of the basin, especially in the arid areas of the upper reaches.This study can provide scientific reference for the development and management of water resources and regional climate regulation over the Yellow River Basin.

Key words: The Yellow River Basin, Evapotranspiration, Temperature, Precipitation, Wind speed

中图分类号:

P426.2⁺1

谷同辉,管晓丹,高照逵,黄小倩,郭书扬. 黄河流域蒸散发与气温和降水以及风速的相关性分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2022, 38(1): 48-56.

Tong-hui GU,Xiao-dan GUAN,Zhao-kui GAO,Xiao-qian HUANG,Shu-yang GUO. Correlation analysis of evapotranspiration with air temperature, precipitation, and wind speed over the Yellow River Basin[J]. Journal of Meteorology and Environment, 2022, 38(1): 48-56.

图/表 10

图1

图2

图3

图4

图5

图6

图7

图8

图9

图10

参考文献 52

1	黄葵, 卢毅敏, 魏征, 等. 土地利用和气候变化对海河流域蒸散发时空变化的影响[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2019, 21 (12): 1888- 1902. doi: 10.12082/dqxxkx.2019.190269
2	Li C C , Zhang Y Q , Shen Y J , et al. Decadal water storage decrease driven by vegetation changes in the Yellow River Basin[J]. Science Bulletin, 2020, 65 (22): 1859- 1861. doi: 10.1016/j.scib.2020.07.020
3	Trenberth K E , Fasullo J T , Kiehl J . Earth's global energy budget[J]. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 2009, 90 (3): 311- 324. doi: 10.1175/2008BAMS2634.1
4	Shukla J , Mintz Y . Influence of land'surface evapotranspiration on the earth's climate[J]. Science, 1982, 215 (4539): 1498- 1501. doi: 10.1126/science.215.4539.1498
5	Dadaser-Celik F , Cengiz E , Guzel O . Trends in reference evapotranspiration in Turkey: 1975-2006[J]. International Journal of Climatology, 2016, 36 (4): 1733- 1743. doi: 10.1002/joc.4455
6	Onyutha C . Statistical analyses of potential evapotranspiration changes over the period 1930-2012 in the Nile River riparian countries[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2016, 226-227, 80- 95. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.05.015
7	温姗姗, 姜彤, 李修仓, 等. 1961-2010年松花江流域实际蒸散发时空变化及影响要素分析[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2014, 10 (2): 79- 86.
8	Mo X G , Chen X J , Hu S , et al. Attributing regional trends of evapotranspiration and gross primary productivity with remote sensing: a case study in the North China Plain[J]. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 2017, 21 (1): 295- 310. doi: 10.5194/hess-21-295-2017
9	Irmak S , Kabenge I , Skaggs K E , et al. Trend and magnitude of changes in climate variables and reference evapotranspiration over 116-yr period in the Platte River Basin, Central Nebraska-USA[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2011, 420-421, 228- 244.
10	Roderick M L , Farquhar G D . Changes in New Zealand pan evaporation since the 1970s[J]. International Journal of Climatology, 2005, 25 (15): 2031- 2039. doi: 10.1002/joc.1262
11	Huo Z L , Dai X Q , Feng S Y , et al. Effect of climate change on reference evapotranspiration and aridity index in arid region of China[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2013, 492, 24- 34. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.011
12	刘健, 张奇, 许崇育, 等. 近50年鄱阳湖流域实际蒸发量的变化及影响因素[J]. 长江流域资源与环境, 2010, 19 (2): 139- 145.
13	Liu C M , Zhang D , Liu X M , et al. Spatial and temporal change in the potential evapotranspiration sensitivity to meteorological factors in China (1960-2007)[J]. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 2012, 22 (1): 3- 14. doi: 10.1007/s11442-012-0907-4
14	童瑞, 杨肖丽, 任立良, 等. 黄河流域1961-2012年蒸散发时空变化特征及影响因素分析[J]. 水资源保护, 2015, 31 (3): 16- 21.
15	张镭, 黄建平, 梁捷宁, 等. 气候变化对黄河流域的影响及应对措施[J]. 科技导报, 2020, 38 (17): 42- 51.
16	赵兰兰, 刘志雨, 王金星. 气候变化下的黄河流域极端水文现象特征分析[J]. 水文, 2015, 35 (5): 78- 81, 90.
17	黄建平, 张国龙, 于海鹏, 等. 黄河流域近40年气候变化的时空特征[J]. 水利学报, 2020, 51 (9): 1048- 1058.
18	王国庆, 乔翠平, 刘铭璐, 等. 气候变化下黄河流域未来水资源趋势分析[J]. 水利水运工程学报, 2020, (2): 1- 8.
19	Huang J , Guan X , Ji F . Enhanced cold-season warming in semi-arid regions[J]. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussions, 2012, 12 (2): 4627- 4653.
20	Huang J P , Yu H P , Dai A G , et al. Drylands face potential threat under 2℃ global warming target[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2017, 7 (6): 417- 422.
21	习近平. 在黄河流域生态保护和高质量发展座谈会上的讲话[J]. 求是, 2019, (20): 4- 11.
22	Editing Commission of the Third National Report on Climate Change of China . The third national report on climate chang[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2015.
23	赵东升, 高璇, 吴绍洪, 等. 基于自然分区的1960-2018年中国气候变化特征[J]. 地球科学进展, 2020, 35 (7): 750- 760.
24	柳春, 王守荣, 梁有叶, 等. 1961-2010年黄河流域蒸发皿蒸发量变化及影响因子分析[J]. 气候变化研究进展, 2013, 9 (5): 327- 334.
25	赵安周, 张安兵, 冯莉莉, 等. 海河流域生态水分利用效率时空变化及其与气候因子的相关性分析[J]. 生态学报, 2019, 39 (4): 1452- 1462.
26	Yang Y T , Guan H D , Batelaan O , et al. Contrasting responses of water use efficiency to drought across global terrestrial ecosystems[J]. Scientific Reports, 2016, 6, 23284.
27	买苗. 黄河流域实际蒸散(发)模型研究[D]. 南京: 南京气象学院, 2004.
28	张小兵, 柳礼香. 1998-2018年黄河流域水资源变化特征研究[J]. 地下水, 2020, 42 (5): 187- 189, 291.
29	Xue C D , Wu H , Jiang X G . Temporal and spatial change monitoring of drought grade based on ERA5 analysis data and BFAST method in the belt and road area during 1989-2017[J]. Advances in Meteorology, 2019, 2019, 4053718.
30	孟宪贵, 郭俊建, 韩永清. ERA5再分析数据适用性初步评估[J]. 海洋气象学报, 2018, 38 (1): 91- 99.
31	王强, 张廷斌, 易桂花, 等. 横断山区2004-2014年植被NPP时空变化及其驱动因子[J]. 生态学报, 2017, 37 (9): 3084- 3095.
32	张静, 任志远. 基于MOD16的汉江流域地表蒸散发时空特征[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37 (2): 274- 282.
33	Smith A A , Welch C , Stadnyk T A . Assessing the seasonality and uncertainty in evapotranspiration partitioning using a tracer-aided model[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2018, 560, 595- 613.
34	王永财, 孙艳玲, 王中良. 1998-2011年海河流域植被覆盖变化及气候因子驱动分析[J]. 资源科学, 2014, 36 (3): 594- 602.
35	王景才, 郭佳香, 徐蛟, 等. 近55年淮河上中游流域气候要素多时间尺度演变特征及关联性分析[J]. 地理科学, 2017, 37 (4): 611- 619.
36	Wang G J , Pan J , Shen C C , et al. Evaluation of evapotranspiration estimates in the yellow river basin against the water balance method[J]. Water, 2018, 10 (12): 1884.
37	宋璐璐, 尹云鹤, 吴绍洪. 蒸散发测定方法研究进展[J]. 地理科学进展, 2012, 31 (9): 1186- 1195.
38	Mu Q Z , Zhao M S , Running S W . Improvements to a MODIS global terrestrial evapotranspiration algorithm[J]. Remote Sensing of Environment, 2011, 115 (8): 1781- 1800.
39	贺添, 邵全琴. 基于MOD16产品的我国2001-2010年蒸散发时空格局变化分析[J]. 地球信息科学学报, 2014, 16 (6): 979- 988.
40	Guan X D , Huang J P , Guo R X , et al. The role of dynamically induced variability in the recent warming trend slowdown over the Northern Hemisphere[J]. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5, 12669.
41	靳英华, 廉士欢, 周道玮, 等. 全球气候变化下的半干旱区相对湿度变化研究[J]. 东北师大学报: 自然科学版, 2009, 41 (4): 134- 138.
42	马柱国, 符淙斌, 周天军, 等. 黄河流域气候与水文变化的现状及思考[J]. 中国科学院院刊, 2020, 35 (1): 52- 60.
43	Zhang Q , Yang Z S , Hao X C , et al. Conversion features of evapotranspiration responding to climate warming in transitional climate regions in northern China[J]. Climate Dynamics, 2019, 52 (7/8): 3891- 3903.
44	Zhang Y Q , Chiew F H S , Peña-Arancibia J , et al. Global variation of transpiration and soil evaporation and the role of their major climate drivers[J]. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2017, 122 (13): 6868- 6881.
45	Huang J P , Zhang W , Zuo J Q , et al. An overview of the semi-arid climate and environment research observatory over the loess plateau[J]. Advances in Atmospheric Sciences, 2008, 25 (6): 906- 921.
46	马守存, 保广裕, 郭广, 等. 1982-2013年黄河源区植被变化趋势及其对气候变化的响应[J]. 干旱气象, 2018, 36 (2): 226- 233.
47	覃巧婷, 陈建军, 杨艳萍, 等. 黄河源植被时空变化及其对地形和气候的响应[J]. 中国环境科学, 2021, 41 (8): 3832- 3841.
48	王苗, 刘敏, 夏智宏, 等. 基于SWAT模型模拟的未来气候变化对洪湖流域水资源影响研究[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2016, 32 (4): 39- 47.
49	赵梦霞, 苏布达, 姜彤, 等. CMIP6模式对黄河上游降水的模拟及预估[J]. 高原气象, 2021, 40 (3): 547- 558.
50	谷佳贺, 薛华柱, 董国涛, 等. 黄河流域NDVI/土地利用对蒸散发时空变化的影响[J]. 干旱区地理, 2021, 44 (1): 158- 167.
51	聂雄, 屈小娜. 水面蒸发计算模型的研究进展[J]. 农村经济与科技, 2018, 29 (7): 45- 47.
52	周文翀, 韩振宇. CMIP5全球气候模式对中国黄河流域气候模拟能力的评估[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2018, 34 (6): 42- 55.

[1]	薛啟,唐亚平,王丽娜,郭海峰,赵慧,马鹏程. 2015—2019年甘肃平凉地区夏季短时强降水时空分布及天气形势特征[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2022, 38(1): 57-64.
[2]	李天宇, 张丽, 付冬雪, 李晓帆, 刘宁. 2019年12月吉林省降水异常偏多成因分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2021, 37(6): 20-26.
[3]	吐莉尼沙,安大维,张超,于碧馨,陈春艳. 基于逐时数据的南疆沙尘天气精细化特征研究[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2021, 37(5): 34-40.
[4]	张晋广, 赵姝慧, 刘旸, 孙丽, 单楠, 张铁凝, 张梦佳. 一次东北冷涡云降水垂直结构特征分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2021, 37(4): 1-8.
[5]	刘艳杰,王清川,许敏,周贺玲. 2019年5月北京一次强降水超级单体特征及成因分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2021, 37(4): 9-17.
[6]	张博,于超,黄威,陈传雷. 欧亚持续性阻塞对6月大兴安岭地区气温和降水的影响及气温的前兆信号研究[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2021, 37(4): 63-69.
[7]	金巍,刘卫华,李晶,康晓玉. 1951—2017年鞍山市气温变化特征及城市热岛变化[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2021, 37(4): 78-85.
[8]	张旭,孙宝利,白佳宁,张丹梅,孙可,杨晓彤,赵振宇,宁喜龙. 阜新地区东北冷涡多模式降水预报检验[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2021, 37(3): 19-24.
[9]	栾兆鹏,卢慧超,李恬,崔向前,赵天良,朱庆瑞. 降水和风对泰安地区PM_2.5浓度的影响及区域传输研究[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2021, 37(3): 33-39.
[10]	黄瑶,游家兴,肖天贵,郭洁. 大气低频振荡对川西持续性强降水的影响[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2021, 37(3): 47-56.
[11]	李黎,崔研,王浩宇,吴国振,杨明,张运芝,赵晓川. 营口市百年气温变化特征研究[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2021, 37(3): 73-80.
[12]	郑小华, 娄盼星, 马永永. 1961—2018年陕西极端气温时空变化特征[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2021, 37(3): 81-87.
[13]	余迪,段丽君,温婷婷,申红艳,汪青春,李红梅. 青藏高原雨季特征及其对气候增暖的响应[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2021, 37(2): 12-18.
[14]	王秀萍,李红斌,张靖萱. 2018年7月大连地区异常少雨天气大气环流分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2021, 37(2): 19-26.
[15]	李宇凡,徐士琦,袭祝香,邱译萱,姜忠宝. 吉林省盛夏降水季内变化特征及大气环流分析[J]. 气象与环境学报, 2021, 37(2): 27-32.

黄河流域蒸散发与气温和降水以及风速的相关性分析

Correlation analysis of evapotranspiration with air temperature, precipitation, and wind speed over the Yellow River Basin

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

图/表 10

参考文献 52

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10